Description: FILESAVE RTF: Number should restart but is counting along Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached file 2. Save as RTF 3. File reload Actual Results: Should count 1-12 and restart Expected Results: Is counting up Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 52820b52b3bca45e2db527d1cc5f4488b2e0b9d0 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL not working at all prior to 6.4
Created attachment 163324 [details] Example file
I fail to reproduce the problem in commit 7b443b2c, built and running on debian-buster. I saved the .pdf by File > "Export As" > "Export as PDF..."; on dialog "PDF Options" is accepted all defult values.
(In reply to Terrence Enger from comment #2) > I fail to reproduce the problem in commit 7b443b2c, built and running > on debian-buster. > > I saved the .pdf by File > "Export As" > "Export as PDF..."; on dialog > "PDF Options" is accepted all defult values. PDF?
(In reply to Telesto from comment #3) > PDF? Comment 2 is ... well, um ... would you believe that my cat wrote it? I see this problem in commit 7b443b2c (2020-07-22), built and running on debian-buster. I am setting status NEW.
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
I still see the problem in bibisect repository linux-64-7.5, s-h cfc8a8f5 running on debian-buster.
If I understand correctly, this could be implemented (spec version 1.6): https://latex2rtf.sourceforge.net/rtfspec_6.html "List override level Each list override level contains flags to specify whether the formatting or start-at values are being overridden for each level. If the format flag (listoverrideformat) is given, the lfolevel should also contain a list level (listlevel). If the start-at flag (listoverridestartat) is given, a start-at value must be provided. If the start-at is overridden but the format is not, then a levelstartat should be provided in the lfolevel itself. If both start-at and format are overridden, put the levelstartat inside the listlevel contained in the lfolevel." In the 1.5 spec I saw the flag was called listoverridestart. It seems the flags are handled, but nothing is done with them: $ git grep -ni listoverridestart include/svtools/rtfkeywd.hxx:896:#define OOO_STRING_SVTOOLS_RTF_LISTOVERRIDESTART "\\listoverridestart" include/svtools/rtftoken.h:1198: RTF_LISTOVERRIDESTART, svtools/source/svrtf/rtfkeywd.cxx:906:{std::u16string_view(u"" OOO_STRING_SVTOOLS_RTF_LISTOVERRIDESTART), RTF_LISTOVERRIDESTART}, sw/source/writerfilter/rtftok/rtfcontrolwords.hxx:902: LISTOVERRIDESTARTAT, sw/source/writerfilter/rtftok/rtftokenizer.cxx:793: { "listoverridestartat"_ostr, { RTFControlType::FLAG, RTFKeyword::LISTOVERRIDESTARTAT } }, .rtf files snipped from results. I'm marking as enhancement to distinguish this better.