Description: FILEOPEN DOCX: OLE Formula objects are nameless objects in the navigator Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached file 2. Save to DOCX 3. File reload 4. Sidebar -> Navigator -> Expand Ole Objects Actual Results: List of nameless items Expected Results: Some object name (similar to DOC). Even generate something if DOCX doesn't support it Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Found in Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: <buildversion> CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL and in 3.5.7.2
Created attachment 163636 [details] Example file ODT
Confirmed. Except... The exported OLE sm Formula is written out directly as OOXML Office Math Markup Language OMML formula "runs". The annotations applied to the ODF draw:frame holding the sm Formula OLE is not filter exported into OOXML. That is to say, IIUC, the draw:name attribute is not present in the export to OOXML--so it can not be restored after round trip which converts the OMML back to MathML and then StarMath syntax needed for the OLE formulas. Just not clear why they would not receive an OLE object name to display on filter import into the UI. @Regina, Miklos?
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2) > Confirmed. Except... And, noticed that if I "touch" each object via its context menu -> Properties menu, when the OOXML has been opened and formulas filter imported that each will take on an object name in the Navigator. But that on save/export back to OOXML on reopening the default object names are again blank to the UI.
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug