Description: Undo of applying character style not working properly Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached file 2. CTRL+A 3. Styles -> Emphasis 4. Select last word ('alley.') 5. Styles -> Default character 6. CTRL+Z 7. CTRL+Z Actual Results: Emphasis Expected Results: Default character style Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: <buildversion> CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL
Created attachment 164446 [details] Example file
Also in LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4
@Heiko This kind of bugs ruins the use of styles, if it's up to me
Applying the Default CS is not undoing the operation. Undo is a special function. And you step through all modifications, meaning the first brings you back to Emphasis and the second to Default again. Don't see a bug.
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > Applying the Default CS is not undoing the operation. Undo is a special > function. And you step through all modifications, meaning the first brings > you back to Emphasis and the second to Default again. Don't see a bug. I'm not sure I understand - we seem to get different results. First undo brings me back to Emphasis. Second undo keeps me in Emphasis, but restores the Strong Emphasis of "around". Seems illogical to me. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: d98ac4d2c584313c1e51630c6fbab8f8a092012c CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 24 September 2020
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #5) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > I'm not sure I understand - we seem to get different results. Me neither ;-). So again: 1. Open the attached file all text has CS Emphasis (italic), around has CS Strong Emphasis (bold), alley is normal 2. CTRL+A 3. Styles -> Emphasis makes all italic (overrides all CS) 4. Select last word ('alley.') 5. Styles -> Default character last word is normal now 6. CTRL+Z last word is italic 7. CTRL+Z all text is selected and italic, around is bold, alley is normal Where is the bug?
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #5) > > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > > I'm not sure I understand - we seem to get different results. > > Me neither ;-). So again: > > 1. Open the attached file > all text has CS Emphasis (italic), around has CS Strong Emphasis (bold), > alley is normal -> Around has 'strong' Emphasis. There rest is default PS without CS (look at the style inspector).. And maybe re-download the example file > 2. CTRL+A > 3. Styles -> Emphasis > makes all italic (overrides all CS) > 4. Select last word ('alley.') > 5. Styles -> Default character > last word is normal now > 6. CTRL+Z > last word is italic > 7. CTRL+Z > all text is selected and italic, around is bold, alley is normal True -> That's the bug :-) @Offtopic BTW -> Me still confused.. CS Strong Emphasis is 'thrown away' by CS Emphasis? Yes, I'm still having trouble getting the concept. If it would happen with DF bold I can understand.. but also for CS?
(In reply to Telesto from comment #7) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > > 7. CTRL+Z > > all text is selected and italic, around is bold, alley is normal > > True -> That's the bug :-) Indeed. Heiko: why do you think, if we start from non-italic and then undo back to the starting stage, it would be normal to remain in italic?
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #8) > (In reply to Telesto from comment #7) > > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > > > 7. CTRL+Z > > > all text is selected and italic, around is bold, alley is normal > > > > True -> That's the bug :-) > > Indeed. Heiko: why do you think, if we start from non-italic and then undo > back to the starting stage, it would be normal to remain in italic? Heiko has sometimes some specific approach; comes with creativity and design. This is a feature we simply we don't get, yet. We are simply to 'conformant'; boring as hell :P. Let undo surprise you.
Indeed, strange bug. Any insights, Mike?
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug