Created attachment 164759 [details] Sample slides (PPTX) How to reproduce: - open attached deck in Impress and Office 365 - observe how the pie chart on both slides is much smaller (and placed differently) in Impress
Created attachment 164760 [details] Screenshot comparing Office 365 (top) and LO 7.1 (bottom)
Seen with Version: 7.0.2.0.0+ Build ID: 5f305e6792c1c166b2a44a1e5085f42f53db50ea CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-7-0, Time: 2020-08-26_00:15:32 Not seen (that badly) with Version: 6.4.4.2 Build ID: 40(Build:2) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US
Bibisected 1cf157fe9d179e2f76ef699b23747d1ba530ebb4 is the first bad commit commit 1cf157fe9d179e2f76ef699b23747d1ba530ebb4 Author: Jenkins Build User <tdf@pollux.tdf> Date: Tue Jul 21 01:39:50 2020 +0200 source 2bb5d9624911eb78ce5a3cd0aa122f9307c50a5c source 2bb5d9624911eb78ce5a3cd0aa122f9307c50a5c instdir/program/libchartcorelo.so | Bin 4559936 -> 4559936 bytes instdir/program/setuprc | 2 +- instdir/program/versionrc | 2 +- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(In reply to BogdanB from comment #3) > Bibisected When a single commit has been identified as the culprit, please add the keyword 'bisected' as well, and if the commit is fixing another bug, add that to the See Also field. It's also good to CC the committer. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=2bb5d9624911eb78ce5a3cd0aa122f9307c50a5c author Balazs Varga <balazs.varga991@gmail.com> 2020-06-16 12:07:45 +0200 committer Xisco Fauli <xiscofauli@libreoffice.org> 2020-06-25 12:18:50 +0200 "tdf#134029 Chart view: enable to move data label" Bug not reproducible in 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (63d4d3421fec5a4e9e88dcee2992cda38cc7452a) / Ubuntu. However, label positioning isn't great, that might be worth a follow-up bug report. Reverse-bibisected the fix to the following commit: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=57fedb272cfcad3436142dbe9eac2870e3c3e3d2 author Balazs Varga <balazs.varga991@gmail.com> 2020-06-23 15:02:59 +0200 committer László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org> 2020-07-09 10:48:55 +0200 "tdf#134225 Chart view: fix moved date label"
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #4) > that to the See Also field. It's also good to CC the committer. The author, not the committer.
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #4) > However, label positioning isn't great, that might be worth a follow-up bug > report. Is https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136235 sufficient for that, or are you thinking of something else? (Please feel free to improve the summary of that report of mine or add any findings. Thank you!)
I do confirm the issue is fixed in Version: 7.0.2.0.0+ Build ID: b27137a7091104cce177791478e86d127680c9af CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #6) > (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #4) > > However, label positioning isn't great, that might be worth a follow-up bug > > report. > > Is https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136235 sufficient > for that, or are you thinking of something else? > > (Please feel free to improve the summary of that report of mine or add > any findings. Thank you!) Yes, I do confirm the labels were at a better position before https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a4cdd4d1266e77330d4745f369db85ee7dba265c, so yes, bug 136235 tracks the same issue