Description: This PDF isn't rendered correctly under LO Draw 7.0 and older versions : https://ffn.extranat.fr/html/ressources/ffn/formulaire_licence_2021.pdf Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open pdf with Draw 2. Compare it with a pdf viewer Actual Results: Several differences : layouts, colors, some texts are note even displayed. Expected Results: The rendering should be the same as the PDF viewer. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.0.0.3 Build ID: 7.0.0-1 Threads CPU : 8; OS : Linux 5.8; UI Render : par défaut; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR.utf8); Langue IHM : fr-FR Calc: threaded
Please change this bug report, to point specifically to a single problem. It should be obvious at which point to look to see the problem ("Compare it with a pdf viewer" is not a good description; something like "See a butterfly-like shape at the bottom-right corner of page 2 - it's green in Adobe Acrobat Reader X.Y.Z, but yellow in Draw" would be better; even better would be a screenshot with a side-by-side comparison of the problematic place). If there are several problems (one would be wrong colors; another would be missing text, etc), then please file several bugs - one per problem. Thanks!
Thanks for reply, it seems that I can't edit the initial description. Let's assume that this bug is for text rendering only, which is the main and most important problem IMHO.
(In reply to lced2-lo from comment #2) Yes, there's no way to edit posts (but title is editable). Please just post a next comment with detailed description - what is missing where. Then the title could be changed to something like "Text is missing in specific PDF (description in comment 4)". And the comment 0 could be tagged "obsolete" for ease of understanding of the bug report. Thanks!
Description: Text is hidden by several layers under LO Draw 7.0 and older versions on the first page of this PDF : https://ffn.extranat.fr/html/ressources/ffn/formulaire_licence_2021.pdf Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open pdf with Draw 2. Select one layer (for example by clicking on upper right corner, then delete it 3. Repeat this several time until all text appears Actual Results: After deleting all layers, text is present. Expected Results: Layers should no be displayed in front of the text. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.0.0.3 Build ID: 7.0.0-1 Threads CPU : 8; OS : Linux 5.8; UI Render : par défaut; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR.utf8); Langue IHM : fr-FR Calc: threaded
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #3) > (In reply to lced2-lo from comment #2) > > Yes, there's no way to edit posts (but title is editable). Please just post > a next comment with detailed description - what is missing where. Then the > title could be changed to something like "Text is missing in specific PDF > (description in comment 4)". And the comment 0 could be tagged "obsolete" > for ease of understanding of the bug report. > > Thanks! It's done, I've found the "real" bug after playing around while updating the bug report.
The "alias" and "URL" fields start looking like spam - please remove these to avoid closing INVALID with deletion request. Thanks.
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6) > The "alias" and "URL" fields start looking like spam - please remove these > to avoid closing INVALID with deletion request. Thanks. Indeed, I didn't notice it
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #7) > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6) > > The "alias" and "URL" fields start looking like spam - please remove these > > to avoid closing INVALID with deletion request. Thanks. > > Indeed, I didn't notice it Sorry, someone changed the link, don't know why, there's the correct one now.
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #6) > The "alias" and "URL" fields start looking like spam - please remove these > to avoid closing INVALID with deletion request. Thanks. These were modified by xiscofauli, can't figure out why.
(In reply to lced2-lo from comment #9) > These were modified by xiscofauli, can't figure out why. rather by "princismaddicts".
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #10) > (In reply to lced2-lo from comment #9) > > These were modified by xiscofauli, can't figure out why. > > rather by "princismaddicts". Yes sorry, I'm not used to read bugzilla logs, my bad.