Bug 136492 - Shadow does not appear in this svg file
Summary: Shadow does not appear in this svg file
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 99562
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Impress (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.0.0.3 release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: filter:svg
Depends on:
Blocks: SVG-Import SVG-filters
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2020-09-05 11:39 UTC by Frederic Parrenin
Modified: 2023-07-07 14:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
.svg image to reproduce the problem (337.28 KB, image/svg+xml)
2020-09-05 11:39 UTC, Frederic Parrenin 		Details
Comparsion LibreOffice 24.2 master vs Chrome (56.48 KB, image/png)
2023-07-03 10:33 UTC, Xisco Faulí 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Frederic Parrenin 2020-09-05 11:39:58 UTC 
Created attachment 165178 [details]
.svg image to reproduce the problem

Steps to reproduce:
- Open Impress
- insert the attached svg image
=> remark that the shadow of the legend does not appear
- open the same svg image with, e.g., inkscape
=> the shadow of the legend appears
Comment 1 Roman Kuznetsov 2020-09-06 18:43:43 UTC 
confirm in

Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 4f76b5e6fdd41d7d7a5302b4e9ea991236c9fdce
CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.15.6; UI render: default; VCL: osx
Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
Comment 2 phv 2021-11-06 14:11:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 97583 ***
Comment 3 Xisco Faulí 2023-07-03 10:28:33 UTC 
This is not related to feGaussianBlur filter, reopening
Comment 4 Xisco Faulí 2023-07-03 10:33:30 UTC 
Created attachment 188174 [details]
Comparsion LibreOffice 24.2 master vs Chrome
Comment 5 Xisco Faulí 2023-07-03 10:35:06 UTC 
At the moment, the filter feColorMatrix is supported but it's called from a mask, and it seems the combination of mask + filter doesn't play well
Comment 6 Xisco Faulí 2023-07-07 14:27:20 UTC 
Yep, root cause is the same as in bug 99562. If values="0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0" is replaced by values="0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0", then it works...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 99562 ***