Created attachment 165902 [details] test ODS file The attached spreadsheet contains two simple columns with 10000 records. When filter some records in the autofilter and then trying to delete those records, the delete operation is very slow. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached spreadsheet, filter the records by deselecting "0" in column B using the autofilter. 2. Try to delete the filtered records by selecting all the whole rows. Current Behaviour: The delete operation takes 35s on my PC. Expected: The delete operation should be fast, within 5s. It takes only 5s in Microsoft Excel 2020. -------------------- Reproduced in both: Version: 6.4.6.2 Build ID: 0ce51a4fd21bff07a5c061082cc82c5ed232f115 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 2cddaa6e199ed8bb6185b7825791199f9da4a670 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN.UTF-8); UI: zh-CN Calc: threaded Fedora 32 x64.
It takes 15s on my PC, not 35. Still very slow.
It takes for me about 7 seconds. Version: 6.4.7.1 (x64) Build ID: 32fe9ceb49bbaa24397ab3ebad5eb8f5287d8086 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 20180; UI render: GL; VCL: win; Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI-Language: en-US Calc: CL
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #2) What's your hardware specs?
Intel I7-7500 2,7GHz, 8 GB. Graphics Intel HD620
it takes 10 seconds in Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 03cafc2ab6b1678f82e9a30b6f81e505660ee702 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded and my computer is old and slow, to be honest. @Kevin, did you try with a clean profile ?
Deselecting 5 and 6 in column A = slow
(In reply to Telesto from comment #6) > Deselecting 5 and 6 in column A = slow 8 seconds with Versie: 4.4.7.2 Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600 Locale: nl_NL surely more than 60 seconds with 7.1 and 6.0 (got bored)
Still OK with Version: 5.2.5.0.0+ Build ID: a4d4fbeb623013f6377b30711ceedb38ea4b49f8 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.2; UI Render: GL; TinderBox: Win-x86@62-merge-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-5-2, Time: 2016-12-24_14:43:55 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: group -> Not hopefully not hijacking this bug :-)
So, not sure whether it's the same issue but I can reproduce the steps mentioned by Telesto. Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 03cafc2ab6b1678f82e9a30b6f81e505660ee702 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded and Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 3a801799536e6870f2fb111b1cc00b9575a35a39 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
Regression introduced by https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=42e472b5870278058537d43d03d457dc80b16166 Closing as a dupe of bug 133878 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133878 ***
Well, the issue was initially reported regarding deleting the rows after the autofilter is set, not about the autofilter itself as mentioned in comment 6. I still reproduce this issue with the fix of bug 133878. This was wrongly marked as duplicate.
Hi Kevin Suo, Could you please try to reproduce it with a master build from http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ ? You can install it alongside the standard version. I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the master build
Dear Kevin Suo, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping
Dear Kevin Suo, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp