Description: This used to work until the last update. It's kind of hard to explain so i'm attaching a file to reproduce it. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the file 2. Add an 8 in A17 Actual Results: - E6 changes to -128 - E8 stays at 0 Expected Results: - E6 changes to -128 - E8 changes to -8 Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes OpenGL enabled: Yes Additional Info: Saving actually updates E8 to -8 Version: 7.0.2.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Interfície: ca-ES 7.0.2-1 Calc: threaded
Created attachment 166375 [details] the file that has the problem
Most likely the same issue as in bug 137248, which has been fixed in master, and will be fixed in 7-0 branch soon. Please test a daily build (https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/) or 7.0.3 release scheduled mid-November.
So i gave you a 5 seconds way to reproduce it and instead of you trying to reproduce it yourself i have to install a daily build from some weird to install format? I'll pass
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3) > So i gave you a 5 seconds way to reproduce it and instead of you trying to > reproduce it yourself i have to install a daily build from some weird to > install format? > > I'll pass Last comment from Min Hua doesn't state that he couldn't reproduce (or anyone else couldn't) but that your report is accepted and most probably has been reported already by some other people. The link and advice given, just provides a way how you could check if the fix, that has been provided by resolution of https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137248 also works for your. But you decided to pass ...
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3) > So i gave you a 5 seconds way to reproduce it and instead of you trying to > reproduce it yourself i have to install a daily build from some weird to > install format? > > I'll pass If you don't like don't do it. But we are volunteers in our free time, so some for your side could be expected. Works for me. Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: c064766901722082df0d759c95434c1460fcdba5 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 20180; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL
(In reply to Uwe Auer from comment #4) > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3) > > So i gave you a 5 seconds way to reproduce it and instead of you trying to > > reproduce it yourself i have to install a daily build from some weird to > > install format? > > > > I'll pass > > Last comment from Min Hua doesn't state that he couldn't reproduce (or > anyone else couldn't) but that your report is accepted and most probably has > been reported already by some other people. The link and advice given, just > provides a way how you could check if the fix, that has been provided by > resolution of https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137248 > also works for your. But you decided to pass ... That's not how i read his/her comment. The bug was set to "needsinfo" which in every other bug tracker i've used means "you need to give us this info, we'll wait until you do so before continuing to investigate this bug". Anyhow thanks for confirming it seems to be resolved :)
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #6) > (In reply to Uwe Auer from comment #4) > > (In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #3) > > > So i gave you a 5 seconds way to reproduce it and instead of you trying to > > > reproduce it yourself i have to install a daily build from some weird to > > > install format? > > > > > > I'll pass > > > > Last comment from Min Hua doesn't state that he couldn't reproduce (or > > anyone else couldn't) but that your report is accepted and most probably has > > been reported already by some other people. The link and advice given, just > > provides a way how you could check if the fix, that has been provided by > > resolution of https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137248 > > also works for your. But you decided to pass ... > > That's not how i read his/her comment. > > The bug was set to "needsinfo" which in every other bug tracker i've used > means "you need to give us this info, we'll wait until you do so before > continuing to investigate this bug". Sorry for making you feel this way. Yes I could test on 7.0.1/7.0.2/master using your sample document and decide if it's a duplicate without your further input, but I don't have a recent daily build installed and it would definitely not be "5 seconds" work. As Uwe Auer said we are all volunteers helping LO in our free time. I don't want to give you a negative impression about LO community, but hope you can understand that we have limited time and sometimes expect bug reporters to do a bit of extra work.
This indeed must be a dupe of bug 137248, let's set as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 137248 ***