Bug 139011 - UI: Disable insert page break for footnote paragraph style?
Summary: UI: Disable insert page break for footnote paragraph style?
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.2.0.0.alpha0+
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: needsUXEval
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2020-12-17 19:00 UTC by Telesto
Modified: 2020-12-18 07:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Telesto 2020-12-17 19:00:19 UTC 
Description:
UI: Disable insert page break for footnote paragraph style?

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Sidebar -> Paragraph style -> Right click footnote style -> Modify
2. Text flow tab -> The page break style is active.. 

Actual Results:
The page break setting can be set

Expected Results:
Maybe not as this isn't allow for footnotes. Yes all styles can be applied to footnotes.. so still not perfect


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: e97a81e94511b52987a50b7bdb72c922899da588
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US
Calc: CL
Comment 1 Heiko Tietze 2020-12-18 07:36:42 UTC 
Page breaks are prevented at footnotes so yes, makes sense to disable. But quite low importance and probably high effort. What do you think, Mike?
Comment 2 Mike Kaganski 2020-12-18 07:40:52 UTC 
"Footnote" paragraph style is just a paragraph style. It only has some name, and is used in footnotes by default, but it has no special properties compared to other styles. Introducing some special processing based on names is bad. It's like having some non-standard hidden undocumented property in the style. And in fact, it doesn't hurt anyone, and just a usual nitpicking - unless there is an actual workflow that would benefit from the proposal. IMO WF.
Comment 3 Heiko Tietze 2020-12-18 07:46:03 UTC 
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #2)
> IMO WF.

ACK