Bug 139470 - Zooming with touchpad is very hard
Summary: Zooming with touchpad is very hard
Status: NEEDINFO
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.1.0.1 rc
Hardware: All All
: medium minor
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: accessibility, topicDoc
Depends on:
Blocks: Zoom
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2021-01-07 13:56 UTC by Arnab
Modified: 2022-12-07 20:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arnab 2021-01-07 13:56:46 UTC
Description:
Zooming with touchpad is very hard. Even though it is very smooth, but It starts to zoom very quickly when we zoom with touchpad, forcing me to use the '+' and "-" buttons to zoom which is tedious.

It was happening even with skia rendering engine.

I don't know if it is a problem with my touchpad but MS word and other software zooms fine with the touchpad.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open Libreoffice writer
2.Try to zoom the document with touchpad

Actual Results:
zooms very fast with the slightest "pinch" using touchpad

Expected Results:
The zooming should have been slower.
I am not a programmer or anything closer to that so I apologize for my bad way of giving information


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes


OpenGL enabled: Yes

Additional Info:
Version: 7.1.0.1 (x64)
Build ID: b585d7d90ab863bf29b2d110c174c0c2a98f3ee4
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: GL; VCL: win
Locale: en-IN (en_IN); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
Comment 1 Telesto 2021-01-07 19:53:10 UTC
Prefer a conformation first. Haven't noticed it on macOS touchpad...
Comment 2 Dieter 2022-02-05 16:06:37 UTC
Might depend on touchpad, because for me zooming is very slow and sometimes zoom increases / decreases 5% and sometimes 10%.

Could you retest with actual version of LO? At least related to bug 106008.
Comment 3 Dieter 2022-12-07 20:31:07 UTC
(In reply to Dieter from comment #2)
> Could you retest with actual version of LO?

=> NEEDINFO