Bug 139474 - Style inspector not showing Direct Formatting in Comment box
Summary: Style inspector not showing Direct Formatting in Comment box
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.1.0.1 rc
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: needsUXEval
Depends on:
Blocks: Writer-Comments Styles_Inspector
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2021-01-07 15:26 UTC by Telesto
Modified: 2021-01-26 09:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Telesto 2021-01-07 15:26:43 UTC
Description:
Style inspector not showing Direct Formatting in Comment box (depending on order)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open Writer
2. Sidebar Style inspector
3. Press Insert comment
4. Type Something
5. Select text & press Bold

Actual Results:
Nothing in the sidebar/ style inspector

Expected Results:
Should show


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 4e3ce9dd6ace0b22f7b3f45cf2338b201f4dc305
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: default; VCL: win
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US
Calc: CL
Comment 1 Dieter 2021-01-26 07:44:00 UTC
I confirm the expected behaviour, but I won't expect informations about comments

Style inspector shows
Para Styles
Para DF
Char Styles
Char DF

For me it is obvious, that this doesn't refer to comments. So let's treat it as enhancement request and ask
Comment 2 Dieter 2021-01-26 07:45:39 UTC
... and ask Design-Team

cc: Design-Team
Comment 3 Heiko Tietze 2021-01-26 08:54:07 UTC
(In reply to Dieter from comment #1)
> For me it is obvious, that this doesn't refer to comments. 

Me too. The SI aims to support investigation of styles - and comments does have a style. So unless bug 103064 becomes implemented this is out of scope.
Comment 4 Mike Kaganski 2021-01-26 08:59:57 UTC
Hmm, why? Comments may technically (per ODF) contain just ~everything - why limit here? It's a low prio, but I'd suppose that as a low-level inspection tool, it might be normal to have it implemented by anyone interested.