Bug 140011 - LibreOffice writer adds dots and dashes to arabic text odt and pdf documents
Summary: LibreOffice writer adds dots and dashes to arabic text odt and pdf documents
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 146199
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
6.1.5.2 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Arabic-and-Farsi Kashida-Justification, Tatweel
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2021-01-30 01:22 UTC by Joseph
Modified: 2022-08-12 17:14 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
4 screen shot images showing the undesirable dots/dashes added by LibreOffice with my partial solution. (214.78 KB, image/bmp)
2021-01-30 01:33 UTC, Joseph
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joseph 2021-01-30 01:22:13 UTC
Description:
LibreOffice writer (all versions) adds dots and dashes to arabic text odt and export to pdf documents. I found a partial solution by unchecking {Kashida-sensitive} in the search dialog box. Fully explained in attached image file.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Nothing special to do. Just write arabic text.
2.Produced especially in Headings (all).
3.

Actual Results:
See attached image file.

Expected Results:
Normal clean text.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
not to add undesirable dots and dashes.
Comment 1 Joseph 2021-01-30 01:33:12 UTC
Created attachment 169290 [details]
4 screen shot images showing the undesirable dots/dashes added by LibreOffice with my partial solution.

Image contains all required information.
Comment 2 Joseph 2021-02-04 01:46:56 UTC
The same behaviour occurs also in Linux Mint 19 & 20 exactly the same.
Comment 3 Joseph 2021-02-04 01:49:57 UTC
The same behaviour occurs also in all versions of libreoffice from 6.1.2 to 7.4 under Linux Mint 19 & 20; exactly the same as in Windows.
Comment 4 Xisco Faulí 2021-02-09 12:18:09 UTC
You can't confirm your own bugs. Moving it back to UNCONFIRMED until someone
else confirms it.
Comment 5 Joseph 2021-02-17 13:03:20 UTC
This bug does not happen in OpenOffice.
Comment 6 Eyal Rozenberg 2021-11-12 16:04:03 UTC
Hello Joseph,

I'm not able to reproduce this effect. Can you please:

1. Provide _exact_ reproduction instructions, for a person who's not fluent in Arabic? Including how to enter the text (or text to copy from this bug page into the document)

2. Provide a sample ODT document and the resulting PDF file?


Also, I have a suspicion that this might have something to do with how Arabic punctuation is encoded, which I've always found a bit confusing. If you'll look at:

https://www.utf8icons.com/subsets/arabic-presentation-forms-b

you'll see characters/code points which are supposed to be "isolated forms" and "medial forms" - with the medial forms having those baselines.

Finally, I don't understand how making changes in the search dialog - which should only affect searching - have any effects on PDF exports.
Comment 7 raal 2022-02-12 14:59:01 UTC
@Joseph, please see comment 6.
Comment 8 QA Administrators 2022-08-12 03:50:38 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 9 ⁨خالد حسني⁩ 2022-08-12 16:12:34 UTC
We need a test file. Closing since it is probably similar to other Kashida bugs.
Comment 10 Eyal Rozenberg 2022-08-12 16:46:08 UTC
I'm actually going to go ahead and mark this as a dupe of another magical-underscore appearance bug.

Joseph, if you can address my comment #6 _and_ believe it's not the same bug, you're welcome to then reopen.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 146199 ***
Comment 11 ⁨خالد حسني⁩ 2022-08-12 17:14:06 UTC
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10)
> I'm actually going to go ahead and mark this as a dupe of another
> magical-underscore appearance bug.
> 
> Joseph, if you can address my comment #6 _and_ believe it's not the same
> bug, you're welcome to then reopen.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 146199 ***

Bug 146199 is in Impress, this one is in Writer, different code bases. People should be a little more careful about marking things duplicate.