Bug 142078 - Improve Autofilter's Color filtering layout
Summary: Improve Autofilter's Color filtering layout
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 76258
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
unspecified
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: needsUXEval
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-05-04 10:33 UTC by Roman Kuznetsov
Modified: 2021-05-07 08:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
Comparize Excel vs Calc screenshot (47.45 KB, image/jpeg)
2021-05-04 10:47 UTC, Roman Kuznetsov
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Roman Kuznetsov 2021-05-04 10:33:01 UTC
Description:
Improve Autofilter's Color filtering layout.

Look at comparize screenshot MS Excel vs LO Calc with active Color filtering.
1. Calc's Autofilter shows huge color squares that hide Autofilter window instead some accurate color rectangles like in MS Excel
2. Calc's Autofilter shows these color squares over Autofilter window instead showing it near Autofilter window like in MS Excel

So I suggest rework Color filtering layout for better UX in that area

Steps to Reproduce:
-

Actual Results:
we have a bad Color filtering layout

Expected Results:
we have a good Color filtering layout


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 931e264590100c555580c413556e229a0f03316a
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI: ru-RU
Calc: threaded
Comment 1 Roman Kuznetsov 2021-05-04 10:47:47 UTC
Created attachment 171628 [details]
Comparize Excel vs Calc screenshot
Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2021-05-04 11:00:26 UTC
Do we really need a new ticket while this is WIP? My take: DUP of bug 76258. And I neither see an advantage in the META ticket.
Comment 3 Heiko Tietze 2021-05-07 08:30:35 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 76258 ***