Description: Tools>Customize>keyboard>numbering; assign ~^n to numbering on/off Put cursor on a numbered paragraph, hit ~^n; nothing happens. Version: 7.2.0.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 614be4f5c67816389257027dc5e56c801a547089 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-CA (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL Steps to Reproduce: 1.Tools>Customize>keyboard>numbering; assign ~^n to Numbering on/off 2.Put cursor on a numbered paragraph, hit ~^n 3. Actual Results: nothing happens. Expected Results: number should go Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: none
Not ure for 100%, what ~^n is, but I assigned ALT+n to Numbering On/Off command an I confirm, that nothing happens. It also fails with other shortcuts. I also don't know the differnece between that command and F12 (ordered list). So I change status to NEW, but add design-team for double-check.
No volunteer so far on the easyhack ;-( *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 126464 ***
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 126464 *** BTW: I havent't searched within the meta bug UNO-Command-New, because this bug is not about new a command. So does it make sense to rename meta bug 86899 to "UNO-Command bugs and enhancements" or something like that?
(In reply to Dieter from comment #3) > BTW: I havent't searched within the meta bug UNO-Command-New, because this > bug is not about new a command. So does it make sense to rename meta bug > 86899 to "UNO-Command bugs and enhancements" or something like that? True. We have bug 86899 [META] Requests for the addition of UNO commands bug 141420 [META] UNO Object Inspector - Development tools bug 115596 [META] Labels of UNO commands bugs and enhancements bug 117710 [META] UNO API issues So perhaps we should create another META for issues with UNO commands or merge those into bug 115596 and rename this one.
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > True. We have > > bug 86899 [META] Requests for the addition of UNO commands > bug 141420 [META] UNO Object Inspector - Development tools > bug 115596 [META] Labels of UNO commands bugs and enhancements > bug 117710 [META] UNO API issues > > So perhaps we should create another META for issues with UNO commands or > merge those into bug 115596 and rename this one. Thanks for the overview. Bug 117710 is still a meta-bug for bug 115596 and bug 86899. So I just added bug 141420. Since I'm not a developer I don't know, if "UNO API" is the same as "UNO command". So for people like me it would be helpful to use consistent lables (if possible).