Created attachment 174906 [details] Example file with four non-primitive custom-shapes Open attached file. It contains four shapes and next to it the markup of the enhanced-path attribute. A is correct. The path is closed by command Z and therefore has no markers. B is wrong. The path is not closed but has only accidentally same coordinates in start and end point. It should show markers. This is a custom shape with an enhanced-path. The handling of polyline and polygon does not apply. C is wrong. The path is closed by command Z and therefore should show no markers. Difference to A is, that here exists a second sub-paths set (starting after the N command) that has a line. D is wrong. The path is not closed and therefore should show markers. It is the same as B but with an addition second sub-paths set with a line.
Created attachment 174907 [details] Example file with five non-primitive custom-shapes Correction: C is OK E is wrong, because a closed path should not have markers regardless of other sub-paths in the same set.
Moving to NEW