Description: The excel like "fat cross" cursor looks ugly IMO. At least on windows. That it's too big and fat is one thing and is a matter of taste. But it has extra shadow that does not belong there. I attach a magnified to 600% picture of the calc fat cross and the excel fat cross for comparison. The extra shadows can be clearly seen. I attach three images: 1. Fat cross from Calc 2. Fat cross from Excel 3. Fat cross as I'd like it I did not consider hight DPI displays here. Steps to Reproduce: Start calc and choose the view option to use a fat cross as the mouse pointer. Actual Results: Ugly fat cross with extra shadows. Expected Results: Nice fat cross. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: n/a
Created attachment 175282 [details] Current calc fat cross, magnified to 600%
Created attachment 175283 [details] Excel's fat cross, magnified to 600%
Created attachment 175284 [details] Fat cross as I'd like it (current one also included)
You are likely aware of bug 104169. I propose this be a duplicate of bug 142500, so please write this there (you may reuse attachment 123456 [details] links, no need to reupload). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 142500 ***
I don't see how this bug is a duplicate of bug 142500. The subject of bug 142500 is the lack of the curstors for high DPI displays. In this report, the form of the cursor on low DPI is discussed. I'd prefer to discuss the two issues separately. So please re-open this issue.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_status Reopen is different, this would be Unconfirmed. But both are for designer, and it's better to keep together IMO, just explain. If just HiRes is done there, then it's easy to set this one New.
The cross is crisp for me in the running application and also in the PNG. Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4dd6af856d574ad66ebb4b822a36ba70af9945e2 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.14; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: de-DE (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Created attachment 178089 [details] Fat-Cursor comparison I can confirm the issue on Windows 10. No matter if SKIA Hardware- or Software-Rendering is used...
Forgot to say, I don't use a high-dpi monitor. Scale-Factor in Windows is 100%.
I reproduce. To see the cross, go to Tools ▸ Options ▸ Calc ▸ View and check "Themed" Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha1+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 52c75986adc2b370eb55ce918ab1db0a95831c83 CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Jumbo
Hi, anyone can see the themed cursor with https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/blob/master/icon-themes/<icon-theme-name>/vcl/res/fatcross.<png;svg> Assuming Windows use default Colibre and no Hi-DPI so probably the file is https://github.com/LibreOffice/core/blob/master/icon-themes/colibre/vcl/res/fatcross.png Comparing this to the screenshot, I can see differences in shadow darkness and some extra pixels also. So all I can say is this bug need code, not design tuning.
Dear fml2, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Nothing hs changed since the initial bug report.