With inspiration from bug 140215 ... In Windows, the icon for Libreoffice Start Center is labeled "Libreoffice" (in the default installation in the Windows Start menu). Enhancement proposal is to rename it to: "Libreoffice Start Center" Reason: All other applications named "Libreoffice (app)", so unclear (at first glance) what "Libreoffice" is supposed to do. Easier to "guess" its likely function with this enhancement.
Reasonable. And if the 'Start Center' string is localized I'm OK with this. If not then no.
I think this is a good idea as well. Localization is an important factor in this case.
Based on Comment 1 and Comment 2 I am marking as NEW enhancement.
Approved by UX... Cloph, this seems to be easyhackable. Any idea how?
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > > Cloph, this seems to be easyhackable. Any idea how? look in source/ooo/folderitem_ooo.scp and the corresponding ulf file. See the safe-mode entry as an example for translated entry.
Sorry for jumping late on this, but I see no point in doing this. I don’t think it’s an unclear shortcut (other software suites have generic launchers with no appendages), and we have never displayed the term “Start Center” anywhere in our UI. In fact, I would argue that “Start Center” is an overblown name for what is simply a *welcome screen*.
Created attachment 180503 [details] Screenshot Windows 10 Looks odd on W10 when the headline is telling the same as the children. W11 reorganized access to installed apps and wont show the tree anymore, IIRC.
Created attachment 180504 [details] Screenshot KDE Screenshot taken from KDE's app starter. Same here, you don't know what you start. I support the Start Center addition.
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8) > Created attachment 180504 [details] > Screenshot KDE > > Screenshot taken from KDE's app starter. Same here, you don't know what you > start. I support the Start Center addition. Irrelevant. It is a KDE bug that it doesn’t sort the entries correctly.
And re: comment 7, no, the tree UI still exists on Windows 11, so the point is moot
Please think of some other skill keyword, I will remove skillInfra completely as the topic lives in Redmine. Already cleaned wiki refs.
I have submitted a patch for this fix on Gerrit: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/200682/1
I don't understand this bug, in the comment 4 this bug was aproved, but gerrit commit is not submited.
(In reply to BogdanB from comment #13) > I don't understand this bug, in the comment 4 this bug was aproved, but > gerrit commit is not submited. Wasn't my comment in Gerrit pretty clear? "I asked about this in the dev and design chats and there was opposition to this change. In the original report there is also opposition. So I'm not sure, if I dare to merge this."
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #14) > (In reply to BogdanB from comment #13) > > I don't understand this bug, in the comment 4 this bug was aproved, but > > gerrit commit is not submited. > > Wasn't my comment in Gerrit pretty clear? > > "I asked about this in the dev and design chats and there was opposition to > this change. In the original report there is also opposition. So I'm not > sure, if I dare to merge this." Yes, but in this case, this bug is invalid.