Description: Type a Heading 1 paragraph, it uses SANS font, and it's "Next Style" is "Text Body", which uses SERIF font. Now, when finished typing a Heading 1 paragraph and press Return key, and start typing a new paragraph, the new paragraph's font still SANS--it should be serif. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Typing a Heading 1 paragraph, which uses SANS font; and it's "Next Style" is "Text Body", which font is SERIF. 2.Press Return key when finish. 3.Continue typing, the font still is SANS. Actual Results: The font of new paragraph can't change to the correct "Next Style". Expected Results: The new paragraph's font should be the one defined in the "Next Style". Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.3.4.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (zh_CN.UTF-8); UI: en-US Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 Calc: threaded
Created attachment 181156 [details] A screen shot to show the "Next Style" font can't apply.
Similar problems are more likely than not a problem of understanding. Please attach minimal sample document. Also see https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Faq/Writer/026
I guess I know the reason. When typing with EN input method, the problem disappears. i.e, type a TITLE style paragraph, its font is SANS; than press ENTER and type a TEXT paragraph, the font change to SERIF, as wish. But when typing with some Chinese input method, the problem come up again. In this case, the Chinese input method is Rime. The OS is Ubuntu 22.04. And in Windows 10 platform, the problem is same, there input method is the Windows 10 default one.
Still you need to attach a sample. Please make explanation and somehow visible differences in Chinese styles, maybe with a color.
Created attachment 181471 [details] A document to show how fonts change in diferent style paragraph.
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
I'm not sure which meta this should be. There are some Chinese like bug 113194 or bug 113193 (which should be one), but let's try with general CTL.
Kevin: any idea about this?
Frank Rowe: would you please test with the latest version (e.g. 7.3.7 or 7.4)? I am aware that there was a similar issue as what you have described in 7.3 but was fixed some time ago.
(In reply to Kevin Suo from comment #9) > Frank Rowe: would you please test with the latest version (e.g. 7.3.7 or > 7.4)? I am aware that there was a similar issue as what you have described > in 7.3 but was fixed some time ago. Frank, is the problem still reproducibel for you with latest version 24.2? => NEEDINFO
(In reply to Dieter from comment #10) > (In reply to Kevin Suo from comment #9) > > Frank Rowe: would you please test with the latest version (e.g. 7.3.7 or > > 7.4)? I am aware that there was a similar issue as what you have described > > in 7.3 but was fixed some time ago. > > Frank, is the problem still reproducibel for you with latest version 24.2? > => NEEDINFO Sorry for so lately to reply. I'm now using 24.2 and the problem never shows up.
(In reply to Frank Rowe from comment #11) > I'm now using 24.2 and the problem never shows up. Thank you for retesting. So let's close as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.