Description: An ordered list in a document will reset the footnote sequence even the footnotes are on the same page. I don't know if it's because the ordered list was "reset" that caused the issue or the list in general could cause that. The footnote sequence setting was "start at per chapter". The footnote sequence got a reset per each ordered list. The sequence reset at the beginning of the list not even after. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Tools->Footnotes and Endnotes. In Footnotes, select "Start at 'Per chapter'" 2. Adding footnotes as usual and the sequence should reset for each chapter normally 3. Add an ordered list for each chapter. Right click one of the list to "List -> Restart Numbering" 4. The footnote sequence will get reset from the beginning of each ordered list. Actual Results: The footnote sequence got reset from the beginning of an ordered list within the same chapter. Expected Results: The footnote sequence should remain the in sequence within the same chapter regardless of any list in the document. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: The footnote sequence should behave normally regardless the existence of any ordered list.
Created attachment 181967 [details] Sample document I can't confirm it with Version: 7.4.0.3 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: f85e47c08ddd19c015c0114a68350214f7066f5a CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: en-GB Calc: CL Steps 1. Open attached document 2. Mark fourth item -> context menu -> list -> Restart Numbering Actual and expected result No change in footnotes KK, could you please retest with document? => NEEDINFO
Dear K K, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping
Dear K K, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp