Bug 151155 - Rename Enable very large spreadsheets (16m rows, 16384 cols) option to shorter and more correct
Summary: Rename Enable very large spreadsheets (16m rows, 16384 cols) option to shorte...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.5.0.0 alpha0+
Hardware: All All
: lowest enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: needsUXEval
Depends on:
Blocks: Options-Dialog-Calc
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2022-09-23 22:23 UTC by Roman Kuznetsov
Modified: 2022-11-18 14:43 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Roman Kuznetsov 2022-09-23 22:23:37 UTC
Description:
Rename Enable very large spreadsheets (16m rows, 16384 cols) option to shorter and more correct

So, in LO 7.4 we already have 16384 columns hardcoded and enabled by default.
Therefore I suggest rename the "Enable very large spreadsheets (16m rows, 16384 cols)" option to just "Enable 16 millions rows" option, because today it enable/disable support for only 16 millions rows and doesn't touch columns amount at all.

Steps to Reproduce:
-

Actual Results:
"Enable very large spreadsheets (16m rows, 16384 cols)" option name looks wrong today

Expected Results:
The option will look correctly today as "Enable 16 millions rows"


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: a3bbdfab809609bec3475613a918eda699fbdc29
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
Comment 1 Roman Kuznetsov 2022-09-23 22:29:25 UTC
Added UX-team and Luboš Luňák
Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2022-09-26 10:12:01 UTC
The actual number is better suited for the tooltip. Would rather shorten the label to "Enable large spreadsheets" with the tooltip "If enabled, you can use up to 16 million rows on small cost of memory and performance.", or the like.
Comment 3 Timur 2022-09-27 10:52:51 UTC
I wouldn't change it myself, as there you ge better info (albeit technically you do not change columns), but I ask for a decision and lower priority, as it will not really enhance LO.
Comment 4 Heiko Tietze 2022-11-18 14:43:46 UTC
We discussed the topic in the design meeting and agree with Timur that this label is not too long and gives some hints. It's not needed to change it.