Description: Version 7.5 of LO Calc changed Input line background from white to gray (like the rest of the UI) which makes is slightly harder to quickly find. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open LO Calc Actual Results: Input line is grey Expected Results: It should be white... Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: ``` Version: 7.5.0.3 (AARCH64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: c21113d003cd3efa8c53188764377a8272d9d6de CPU threads: 10; OS: Mac OS X 13.1; UI render: default; VCL: osx Locale: pl-PL (es_PL.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded ```
Can you please share a screenshot of the issue?
Created attachment 185223 [details] Screenshot of gray background in Input field
Added.
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
I cannot reproduce the issue on Linux/Windows. It may be an osx backend issue, but I don't have a Mac to test it. Let's wait for someone else to test it.
It is also black in dark mode I wonder if this change is related to the new dark mode support?
There were changes as to how LibreOffice follows dark / light mode on macOS. @Wojtek: Could you install LibreOffice nightly build and see if the problem persists using that build: https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master Note: To open LibreOffice nightly on macOS please refer to: https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/open-a-mac-app-from-an-unidentified-developer-mh40616
@steve which version should I use? tb94, tb93, tb92? Will it run on independent (user-data) profile so I can run in in the same system user profile? (so to avoid messing up LO configuration I have)
Main builds use a separate profile. Use the architecture that matches your mac chip (aarch64 for Apple Silicon, x86_64 for Intel).
I know I should choose correct OS and architecture, but even for that combination there are a couple of options. Previously there were 3, but now they are still two: ``` MacOSX-aarch64@tb92-TDF/ - 2023-Apr-22 03:21 MacOSX-aarch64@tb94-TDF/ - 2023-Apr-23 22:05 ``` Which one should I use?
(In reply to Wojtek from comment #11) > Which one should I use? https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/current.html
(In reply to ady from comment #12) > (In reply to Wojtek from comment #11) > > > Which one should I use? > > https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/current.html Sorry, I pressed "save changes" too early. By now, just pick one of those that match your OS and architecture.
@Wojtek: if more than a singel build is available for your computer, why not choose the latest?
@adv I downloaded `LibreOfficeDev_7.6.0.0.alpha0_MacOS_aarch64.dmg` (MacOSX-aarch64@tb92-TDF / 2023-04-22 05:19:34 / https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/MacOSX-aarch64@tb92-TDF/2023-04-22_05.20.54/LibreOfficeDev_7.6.0.0.alpha0_MacOS_aarch64.dmg) But when trying to run it I get the error that the application is broken, and I should move it to trash: `“LibreOfficeDev.app” está dañado y no se puede abrir. Deberías trasladarlo a la papelera.` (it's different from the typical FileVault issue where the package is not signed/notarised and one have to confirm opening in system preferences) @steve Because wanting to be sure that I get the right package? What's more, downloading is very slow...
I checked the other nightly but it has the same issue. (https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/open-a-mac-app-from-an-unidentified-developer-mh40616 does not apply in this case neither)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing_Daily_Builds#Daily_builds_install_and_run_in_parallel_to_a_normal_release_version Quote (but it's even better to read the wiki page directly): " To run an installed macOS daily build, you either need to open it twice or run this command against the application in a terminal: xattr -d com.apple.quarantine /path/to/LibreOfficeDev.app " HTH.
Thanks ady. ad rem - the issue is still there.
Created attachment 186929 [details] libre.office.7.6.gray.png