Description: aynı anda sadece tek harf rengi kullanabiliyoruz. birden fazla harf rengini kullanmak istiyorum. fakat harf rengi simgesi (A) bir tane atanabiliyor ve her tıklamada aynı rengi veriyor. bir den fazla (A) renk simgesi atayabilmek istiyoruz. Steps to Reproduce: 1.birden fazla 2. harf rengi 3. atamak. Steps to reproduce anlamsız ve gereksiz bir kutucuk. Hardware, operating system ve severity kutucukları da saçma ve gereksiz. Actual Results: Neden böyle her şeyi zorlaştırıyorsunuz. insanlar zaten hangi sistem için öneri yaptıklarını yazarlar. bir sürü kutucuk ve bir sürü soruya hep saçma cevaplar vermek zorunda kalıyoruz. ÖNERİ İÇİN TEK BİR KUTUCUK YETERLİ. ÖNERİDE BULUNMAMIZI ZORLAŞTIRIYORSUNUZ. Summary e diğer kutucuklara gerek yok, Sadee DESCRIPTION kutucuğu yeterli. saçma şeylerle bize büyük zaman kaybettiriyorsunuz. actual results saçma bir kutucuk. gereksiz. Expected Results: umulan sonucu siz de tahmin edebilirsiniz. bu kutucuk saçma ve gereksiz bir kutucuk Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: bu da saçma ve gereksiz bir kutucuk
Please, it would help everyone if you translated your submissions.. Description: we can only use one letter color at a time. i want to use more than one letter color. but the letter color icon (A) can be assigned only one and gives the same color on each click. we want to be able to assign more than one (A) color icon. Steps to Reproduce: 1.more than one 2. letter color 3. assign. Steps to reproduce is a pointless and unnecessary box. Hardware, operating system and severity boxes are also pointless and unnecessary. Actual Results: Why do you make everything so difficult. people already write which system they are making a suggestion for. so many boxes and so many questions we always have to give nonsense answers. ONE BOX IS ENOUGH FOR A SUGGESTION. YOU MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR US TO MAKE SUGGESTIONS. There is no need for Summary and other boxes, just DESCRIPTION box is enough. you make us waste a lot of time with nonsense. actual results is a nonsense box. unnecessary. Expected Results: you can also predict the expected result. this box is ridiculous and unnecessary. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: this is also a ridiculous and unnecessary box Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
I think this is a clear "won't fix". We already offer a colour picker in the dropdown to change the colour, and the button uses the latest colour used. The "document colours" and "recent colours" palettes help you find your favourite ones. If you need this level of customisation (two buttons for the same function), you can use a marco or extensions. Heiko, has this been requested in the past? Same UNO command twice in the toolbar? Related to the form of the report: please use a more respectful tone. Those fields you criticise, although admittedly not as useful for enhancement requests, are actually very helpful when users report bugs (i.e. most people), so we know exactly what the problem is and help test and troubleshoot. Finally, reports need to be in English. You can use an automatic translation if it helps. Please see: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Policies_and_Procedures#Policies
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #2) > Related to the form of the report: please use a more respectful tone. I feel shouted at me. > Heiko, has this been requested in the past? The font color widget offers all freedom to colorize text. Once set you continue to write in this color, which is a convenience feature yet frequently challenged. I see no clear use case and think the OP will not add any. => WF