Created attachment 187134 [details] A test document showing the reported issues On Fedora 36 (and previous versions), using Japanese fonts gave no problems. But after upgrading my laptop to Fedora 38, Japanese fonts are no longer printed unless they are bold. When entering the text in LO, everything looks normal. The print preview also looks normal. But when printed to paper or when exported to PDF, all Japanese characters without extra layout (bold, italic etcetera) are not printed. The first time I noticed this was after entering text in a table. Thats why i have experimented with tables in the added document. I also tried to print a page with Japanese kana I found on internet. That page printed without problems.
Created attachment 187135 [details] A test document showing the reported issues
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 155161 ***
Created attachment 187137 [details] test file On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I don't reproduce this. Could you try https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Corrupted_user_profile ?
@Julien Nabet What did you do to create attachement 187137? Is it a PDF you generated from tje attached ODT-document?
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #3) > Created attachment 187137 [details] > test file > > On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I don't reproduce > this. > > Could you try > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Corrupted_user_profile ? I followed this link and restarted LO with "soffice -env:UserInstallation=file:///tmp/test" This didn't resolve the problem
(In reply to Ben.Engbers@Be-Logical.nl from comment #4) > @Julien Nabet > What did you do to create attachement 187137? Is it a PDF you generated from > tje attached ODT-document? Yes I generated the pdf from LO built from master sources updated today.
(In reply to Ben.Engbers@Be-Logical.nl from comment #5) > ... > I followed this link and restarted LO with "soffice > -env:UserInstallation=file:///tmp/test" > > This didn't resolve the problem Ok thank you for the feedback. Since Khaled put this one as DUP of tdf#155161, I'll trust him and suppose he'll find a fix.