Bug 156992 - The size of the OLE-frame and the embedded document does not match
Summary: The size of the OLE-frame and the embedded document does not match
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Base (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.5.3.2 release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bisected, regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-08-29 20:04 UTC by Kadet
Modified: 2023-09-07 11:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Demo-file (249.40 KB, application/zip)
2023-08-29 20:07 UTC, Kadet 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kadet 2023-08-29 20:04:31 UTC 
Description:
The size of the document embedded in the OLE-frame does not correspond to the size of the frame. The OLE-frame is nested in the Base form.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Extract from the archive db_with_ref_2.zip files and put out on the desktop.
2.Run the db_with_ref_2.odb file
3.Open form1

Actual Results:
The Calc document nested in the OLE-frame Object2 does not match the size of the parent OLE-frame. An example is shown in Pic2.jpg .

Expected Results:
A Calc document nested in an OLE-frame Object2 must be inscribed in an OLE-frame and be the same size with it.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
Before LO version 7.5.3, this worked. The sizes of the documents corresponded to each other.
Comment 1 Kadet 2023-08-29 20:07:27 UTC 
Created attachment 189232 [details]
Demo-file

Extract files to the desktop. 
Run the db_with_ref_2.odb file. 
Open form1.
Comment 2 Mike Kaganski 2023-09-07 09:30:00 UTC 
Regression after commit be7ce49f33035fcd289a5ffc7a2307bd9a566780.

It may be tested using the macro from bug 156991 comment 2.

It was fixed by commit fc5aae69934000d81492668b3a40889bba5d3099 (should be backported?).
Comment 3 Xisco Faulí 2023-09-07 09:40:48 UTC 
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #2)
> Regression after commit be7ce49f33035fcd289a5ffc7a2307bd9a566780.
> 
> It may be tested using the macro from bug 156991 comment 2.
> 
> It was fixed by commit fc5aae69934000d81492668b3a40889bba5d3099 (should be
> backported?).

it was already backported. See bug 156270
Comment 4 Kadet 2023-09-07 11:50:01 UTC 
Thanks!