Description: The output is not correct. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Print a serial letter with output into a single document Source database is a calc sheet. Actual Results: The first output document is correct, starting with the second the fields are not filled correctly. Instead of creating one single document, it is working correctly with creating individual documents, even with printing one single document. The error can be reproduced with version 7.5.9.2 too. It is working correctly with Open Office 4.1.4 too. Expected Results: Correct assignement of the fields of single rows to a single page/document. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.6.4.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: e19e193f88cd6c0525a17fb7a176ed8e6a3e2aa1 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE Calc: CL threaded
Created attachment 191583 [details] serial letter
Created attachment 191584 [details] source database
The last version with working serial letter printing into a single file was 7.2.7.2.
Created attachment 191657 [details] generated file Tested with Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 71c28942fbc7f36e5bcd46c5a6cdfbb3fcbcd6a0 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.2; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: cs-CZ (cs_CZ.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded - saved file looks good to me. Please check it, maybe I misunderstood the problem. Thanks.
The output you created looks not good at all. The CALC-File on which the serial letter is based contains three rows and I expect three output pages too. The adress block should consist of the character B to H followed be number 1 and the "Nummer" 1/2023 on page one, B-H 2 and "Nummer" 2/2023 on page two and B-H 3 and "Nummer" 3/2023 on page three. Page one of output is correct, in page two the adress block is missing, "Nummer" is correct. Page three contains the address block of page two and the "Nummer" of page 3. Page four is empty and page five contains only the adress block which I expect in page 3. If you want to see the correct output print the serial letter with output into single documents. That is working.
Created attachment 191663 [details] generated file from 7.2 alpha file generated with Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha1+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: ff2ba77f22b2e96f96f5537aec1705956b47583d CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.2; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: cs-CZ (cs_CZ.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded I believe this is the correct output, therefore regression, confirm.
This seems to have begun at the below commit in bibisect repository/OS linux-64-7.3. Adding Cc: to Michael Stahl ; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks df462691a013a8e99d9a11c0620dd03016fedfab is the first bad commit commit df462691a013a8e99d9a11c0620dd03016fedfab Author: Jenkins Build User <tdf@pollux.tdf> Date: Thu Dec 23 12:19:13 2021 +0100 source 6433dc223f6d21570e7132c4a580d186a5d5a334 127261: Revert "Revert "sw_fieldmarkhide: init fieldmark mode from options"" | https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/127261
Dear RS, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Version: 25.8.4.2 (X86_64) Build ID: 290daaa01b999472f0c7a3890eb6a550fd74c6df CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 11 X86_64 (build 26200); UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE Calc: CL threaded