Description: Dear HIGHNESSES of Development of Software ! ... let me have a joe to you ... I updated LO to first 24 Version RC2 today. " As it ever was " ( reminds me to some popular pop song - i cant get in mind ) but long ago i posted " the same precidiure as every yer " ( known for european people ) =============== Tha main package *.msi as well the help package installatet FINE ! TOO the " sdk.* package ! =============== BUT: in the SCREEN SHOT of my windows apps overview, YOU see, what has happened NOW, and BEFPORE on the sdk.msi ================================================== It might be WINDOWS ( winthin some Intelligence / or not ), BUT it might be the -> LO INSTALLER =================================== I think, that there is a ( very minor ) reason to check, what the difference on the installers of the 3 packages is. kind regards FIRST: Have a nice day ( and life ) see screenshot Steps to Reproduce: 1.have a nice day 2. 3. Actual Results: the sun is shining at home Expected Results: same Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: see screen shot
Created attachment 192034 [details] screen shot
Is it fun - to invent "funny" wording, so that reading it and trying to understand what's the problem becomes a pain? Is the problem as simple as: "Installing a new SDK using MSI package does not replace previous installations, and installs side-by-side; see the screenshot"?
Hi, it seems to be replaced ( i dont know how to examine it // do once had the idea to "try " to program a tool ) WHAT SEEMS to me: There is every time left - I GUESS _ some registry ( windows // cann not tell anything in linux ) ENTRIES THAT are NOT " cleaned " anyway - NO REAL HARD CORE BUG ! ============================================================= BUT i looks, the installation ( tool / method ) on "sdk" is different ( might be not THAT ON TIME ) like the installer of help / main package. ============================================================= What is left, i show, EVERY YEAR here in this BUGZILLA. _______________________ Got me ? BEST regards to you. Might have one have the time the to look after !? ================================== REALLY : NOT THAT HAVY !
HI again, I can tell, that " dont know OLD PACKEGES " can be DEINSTALLED ( from within windows ) : QUIET NICE ! TAKE VERY VERY VERY few time: ... One might guess - there is anyhow " nothing to do" JUST clearing up ( I DONT KNOW ). Best wishes. j
Please make simple sentences (subject-verb-complement), stop the gibberish style and focus on the bug instead of using irony/"fun" stuff. Then just answer Mike's question.
OK ! I installed 1) LO - MAIN 2) LO - Help 3) LO - SDK What is left on my windows 10 System are the old packages of LO - SDK. SHORT sentences enough ? regards to the developers. j amused ?
SDK packages are created to be able to install side-by-side; this is done for purpose. The SDK packages are only needed to developers creating extensions / add-ons for LibreOffice. A developer might depend on some specific version of the API. Therefore, the SDK is by default installed into directories with version in the name. This is not a bug.
HI THANX for declaration. 1) I thaught about ( somewhat ) left ( my win system ) UNDELETED Registry ( -> regedit.exe ) entries // or such else ?? 2) OR: May be the installation routines ( for sure I think :: on the main packages LO + help ) - THESE ARE UP TO DATE on the Linux / Windows Systems ( but can not tell about Linux - because I use W10 ) --- AND // OR ( might be ) the developers " did not " force " developement time on " SIDE APPS - like sdk " ( normal users do eventually SELDOM use especially dont install ) ================================================================== THANX ! REGARDS to you // AGAIN for declaration _______________________________________ Out of THIS !? DOES a LO - USER need SDK to have MACROES ( anyhow : collecting clicks/ keystrokes german // dont know in your language ) ? To programm small (?) basic apps ( inside a chart or so ) or use - there is some " LO - java - inside " ? =============================================== IF it is NOT nessecary to have installed SDK to create some individual SUCH " tools " ( again ) ... Basic / Macroes ) --------- on the download -page/-site a hint could be inserted " you dont have to download, if only you want to create some ... " =========================================================================== THANX again jk
(In reply to Karl from comment #8) > DOES a LO - USER > need SDK to have MACROES ( anyhow : collecting clicks/ keystrokes german > // dont know in your language ) ? > > To programm small (?) basic apps ( inside a chart or so ) > or use - there is some " LO - java - inside " ? No, it is not needed - nor for macro recording, nor for writing them in Basic IDE. > IF it is NOT nessecary to have installed SDK > to create some individual SUCH " tools " > ( again ) ... Basic / Macroes ) > > --------- > > on the download -page/-site a hint could be inserted " you dont have to > download, if only you want to create some ... " The SDK is separate; all the tools user needs are suggested in the thick boxes on the download site. There is unlimited number of things that are *not* needed; trying to create a list that is *not* needed is not needed itself (aside from being impossible). This "problem" seems to appear the first time ever; so definitely not something to clutter the download page with.
HI Mike Kaganski ! OKY DOKY !!! May be for such " Hmm - Newbies , that like to EXPERIMENT programming ) a " hint " could be useful. //I can spare the downloading sdk in future =============================================== I give YOU !! THAT RESOLVED ! Best wishes from germany juergen // BEGIN END -:)