Bug 159609 - Formula object is no longer vertically centered within a sentence
Summary: Formula object is no longer vertically centered within a sentence
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 159302
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Formula Editor (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
24.2.0.3 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-02-06 23:10 UTC by chiensyang@hotmail.com
Modified: 2024-02-07 01:30 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description chiensyang@hotmail.com 2024-02-06 23:10:56 UTC
Description:
For Writer 24.2.0.3 (X86_64), when a formula object is inserted as a character within a sentence, instead of being vertically centered as before, the object is vertically aligned at the top.  As an example, in the old version, the formula object was displayed as below.

                                +-------+
   The result of the expression | x + 2 | is 3.
                                +-------+

In the new version, the object is displayed as

   The result of the expression +-------+ is 3.
                                | x + 2 |
                                +-------+

Please let me know if this is a bug, or if there is a setting which I can modify.  Thanks.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. In a Writer document, write a sentence.
2. Insert a formula object within the sentence.
3. Create any mathematical expression in the object.

Actual Results:
The formula object IS NOT vertically centered within the sentence.

Expected Results:
The formula object should be vertically centered within the sentence.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Version 24.2.0.3 (X86_64)
Comment 1 V Stuart Foote 2024-02-07 01:29:00 UTC
Thanks for filing, known issue with map units for the Math formula editor please follow in the dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 159302 ***