Description: when display has a display width significantly higher than 1080p (such as with some 2k and 4k displays) the texture used in "Options -> Personalisation" do not span the tool bar completely. this applies to all "LibreOffice" sub programs (writer, spreadsheet, etc). changing the window width will exaggerate or reduce the effect accordingly. Steps to Reproduce: 1.enforce a "high resolution" width (2k+) 2.under "options -> Personalisation" set a "preinstalled theme" (any) 3.note the untextured section to the top left. if effect is not visible, stretch the width of the window until it is (window may have to exceed display width depending on display hardware) Actual Results: N/A Expected Results: N/A Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 24.2.4.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 51a6219feb6075d9a4c46691dcfe0cd9c4fff3c2 CPU threads: 24; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-AU (en_AU); UI: en-GB Calc: CL threaded
Created attachment 194914 [details] Ultrawide screen snip
Created attachment 194915 [details] 1080p screen snip
Don't use the personalized themes, the area fill artwork is not sufficient. Instead just let the os/DE theme assert. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 131023 ***
and what if i dont want to use the device theme? or what if that is not a viable option under the circumstances? you have a feature with a known bug. one that is, evidently, trivial to resolve. an ACTUAL solution would be nice. the artwork width could be updated to support higher resolutions, it could be made to stretch to fit, it could be made procedural, multiple resolutions for modern display widths could be packaged. if there is an end user solution then please indicate so. simply "don't use this feature" is not a solution. its the same logic as "if your car's AC doesn't work on cold days, dont use it". the feature is there to be used and if it does not work or has an issue, it should be either fixed or acknowledged as "on the list but low priority". the way you've worded your statement seems to imply that the issue is known and wont be fixed. likewise, there is little mention of any solution or intent to fix on the bug this is marked as a duplicate of.
(In reply to benjaminwinter2 from comment #4) > and what if i dont want to use the device theme? or what if that is not a > viable option under the circumstances? you have a feature with a known bug. > one that is, evidently, trivial to resolve. an ACTUAL solution would be > nice. the artwork width could be updated to support higher resolutions, it > could be made to stretch to fit, it could be made procedural, multiple > resolutions for modern display widths could be packaged. if there is an end > user solution then please indicate so. simply "don't use this feature" is > not a solution. its the same logic as "if your car's AC doesn't work on cold > days, dont use it". the feature is there to be used and if it does not work > or has an issue, it should be either fixed or acknowledged as "on the list > but low priority". the way you've worded your statement seems to imply that > the issue is known and wont be fixed. likewise, there is little mention of > any solution or intent to fix on the bug this is marked as a duplicate of. option of editing of one's comments is not available. i apologise if the tone comes across confrontational. if a proper solution could be presented, or a potential timeline of when said bug may be resolved, it would be appraciated.
(In reply to benjaminwinter2 from comment #5) > option of editing of one's comments is not available. i apologise if the > tone comes across confrontational. if a proper solution could be presented, > or a potential timeline of when said bug may be resolved, it would be > appraciated. No offense taken. We'll either strip out the long broken Mozilla flavor personalization themes, or reimplement something similar that is a bit more functional. Issue will track with BZ bug 131023 this has been set as duplicate. To which you've now been subscribed by that dupe action. But, should be obvious it is a pretty low priority issue. And why the suggestion of just allowing os/DE theme to assert. Much better support has been implemented cross platform for following desktop environment.
thankyou for your understanding, and the clarification of the details.