Created attachment 42782 [details] lwp '97 file containing different styles of bullet points The attached .lwp document uses all of the default styles built into Lotus Word Pro '97 for bullet points. When opened in Writer, the numbered bullet points don't increment correctly. i.e. it shows as 1. 1. 1. rather than 1. 2. 3. and i. i. i. rather than i. ii. iii. There is one exception however - the uppercase roman numeral style of bullet does increment correctly (i.e. I. II. III.) and behave as expected. It'll even handle skipped bullet points correctly. It should therefore be a fairly easy fix to get the other number displays to work in the same way. I've also attached a .pdf with expected output and Writer output.
Created attachment 42783 [details] PDF showing LWP '97 and LibO Writer 3.3.0 handling of bullets.lwp
[This is an automated message.] This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases. Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1 more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html
reproduced in 3.6.0 master on Fedora 64 bit And on console appears this: warn:legacy.osl:6959:1:/usr/src/libre-master/core/sw/source/filter/ww8/ww8par.cxx:3170: WW8: Please report this document, it may have a missing graphic warn:legacy.osl:6959:1:/usr/src/libre-master/core/xmloff/source/core/xmlerror.cxx:195: An error or a warning has occurred during XML import/export! Error-Id: 0x10020002 Flags: 1 WARNING Class: 2 FORMAT Number: 2 Parameters: 0: style:font-name-asian 1: Exception-Message:
Confirmed with: LO 4.2.0.0.alfa0 Build ID: 2013-06-24 own debug build Windows 7 Professional SP1 64 bit Same results as in reporter's PDF.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: *Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.4.1 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ *If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior *If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT *Update the version field *Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) *Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-04-18
Confirmed. Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 5.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 01a189abcd9a4ca472a74b3b2c000c9338fc2c91 TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2015-06-14_07:46:28 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI)
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.5 or 5.2.1 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20160920
Dear Jaxson Lee, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce this. I noticed same kinds of logs as Sasha (see comment 3)
Still repro in: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: bbec710bd25fc5da27636cde73fe4ab23c76904f CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: cs-CZ (cs_CZ); UI: en-US Calc: CL
Created attachment 181218 [details] Intermediate format: StarOffice XML from LO 7.4.0
Bartosz Kosiorek committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/a0bcd1d187a4e56a9fa600462842004545b6be9c tdf33787 lotuswordpro: fix increments of ordered bullets It will be available in 7.5.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Bartosz Kosiorek committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-4": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/55a360860e9c5c608326656a7cf56a0b86f2f7c7 tdf33787 lotuswordpro: fix increments of ordered bullets It will be available in 7.4.0.2. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
The issue was fixed. Remainging issue with default (not ordered) bullets will be covered with ticket: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33838