Bug 37173 - You can not use Reynolds number in formula editor
Summary: You can not use Reynolds number in formula editor
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Formula Editor (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
3.3.1 release
Hardware: x86 (IA32) Windows (All)
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-13 04:44 UTC by András Vöröskői
Modified: 2020-01-19 14:21 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description András Vöröskői 2011-05-13 04:44:14 UTC
If you try to write Re into the formula editor it always changes it to that curlicued R used for the real part of complex numbers[1].

It would be awesome to have an option to disable this feature somehow, as in fluid dinamics Re is used for Reynolds number[2] which has nothing to do with this curlicued R.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number
Comment 1 gleppert 2011-05-13 14:57:23 UTC
Dear András, thanks for your report. I changed the bug to "enhancement" instead of "bug".
Comment 2 Sergiy 2011-10-24 07:21:28 UTC
You can use ital"Re" in formula editor for correct representation of Re. May be it isn't a bug, but peculiar properties.
Comment 3 Björn Michaelsen 2011-12-23 12:06:39 UTC
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html
Comment 4 András Vöröskői 2012-07-05 07:50:10 UTC
Sergiy's method is just fine for me, thanks.
Comment 5 Hector Espinoza 2020-01-19 14:21:17 UTC
(In reply to Sergiy from comment #2)
> You can use ital"Re" in formula editor for correct representation of Re. May
> be it isn't a bug, but peculiar properties.

Just use "Re" since the abbreviation of Reynolds number is not italic.