Memo to myself: CSV related OOo bugs worth to be inspected. http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87999 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102810 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113421 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117400 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117508 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117601 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60110 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82687 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82952 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91028 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110931 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75199 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78926
Created bug 39869 for http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117400
For http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113421 there's bug 32703
AOO infrastructure doesn't redirect old OOo Bugzilla URLs to new location, so here's the same list (minus the 2 fixed ones) pointing to AOO Bugzilla, sorted by ID: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=60110 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=75199 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=78926 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=82687 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=82952 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=87999 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=91028 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102810 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=110931 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117401 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117508 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117601
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=87999 is obsolete with the implementation of date acceptance patterns in LibO 3.6 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=108678 UTF-8 BOM is recognized since at least LibO 3.4.5 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117601 not reproducible
Created bug 48347 for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117508
Created bug 48501 for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=91028 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
Created bug 48516 for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=75199
Created bug 48621 for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=78926
For overview, the remaining list is https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=60110 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=82687 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=82952 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102810 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=110931
Created bug 48706 for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=82687
Created bug 48731 for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=60110
This bug hasn't seen any action. Freeing this bug and switching ASSIGNED to NEEDINFO Eike if you are still working on this, please re-assign yourself. Looks like a meta bug to my eyes for which all dependencies have been fixed. Can this be closed?
The created fdo dependencies are fixed, what remains are old OOo bugs pointed to in comment 10 minus the two of comment 11 and comment 12. I wanted to check them if they are still relevant but then this went out of my sight..
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 is moot, starting import from rows >32000 is possible. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=82952 whether CR only should be a line delimiter or not (or LF only) could be implemented as an enhancement, a new option in the dialog and import. However, so far there isn't a specific requirement for this. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=102810 does not occur anymore. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=110931 accepting '6043:6026' as time value with increment still occurs. This is nothing CSV import specific though and happens also on user input.
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team
Don't we all love automatisms? ;-) There's only https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=110931 left, accepting '6043:6026' as time value with increment. This is nothing CSV import specific though and happens also on user input and was always the case. Let's close this.