Created attachment 53829 [details] This file created by MS Office 2003 with numbered formulas Problem description: I try to open .doc document created by MS Word 2003 (such as attached). This document contains formulas in tables with captions created by next steps: By Insert->Reference->Caption we created new label named "(" with numeric value and ")" after it. This caption inserted after the table with formula And finally this caption cut-pasted to right cell of the table. Next formulas created by copy-pasting first formula table. When I try now to open this document in LibreOffice 3.4.4 or 3.4.3 (Windows or Linux versions) all links and captions converted to (0) . Rightclick - Fields shows: (sorry for poor translation from Ukrainian) Field type: Numbering range Choice (or Selection): ( Format: Arabic (1 2 3) Name: Unaccessible Value: (+1 Level: None Separator: Unaccessible If I create any document with LibreOffice and save it to .doc there are no problems! But I can not keep formula numbering in MS Word .doc documents opened by LibreOffice 3.4.3 and 3.4.4. Possible reason is: In genuine LO documents (.odt or .doc) Rightclick -> Fields shows: ... Value: Text+1 ... Is it a problem with MSWord's "(+1" ??? And how to fix or workaround? Steps to reproduce: 1. Open attached document in LibreOffice (possible, OOo) Current behavior: Formula numbers (0), (0) Expected behavior: Formula numbers (1), (2) Platform (if different from the browser): Intel Dual-Core T2330 1,6GHz 533MHZ FSB 1MB L2 Cache Intel GL960 Express 2GB RAM Ubuntu 11.04 x86_64 Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Ubuntu; X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0
Reproduced with LOdev 3.5.0beta2 4ca392c-760cc4d-f39cf3d-1b2857e-60db978 Ubuntu 10.04.3 x86 Linux 2.6.32-37-generic Russian UI
reproducible with LO 4.0.2.2 (Win7 Home, 64bit) Steps Done: 1. Open the attached document in WRITER Result: Formula numbers ( 0), ( 0) 2. Open the attached document in WORD 2007 Result: Formula numbers ( 1), ( 2) To Check the Field Data: Double left mouse click on the figures "0" in the table or right mouse click on the figures "0" in the table and go to FIELDS.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.4.1.2 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-03-03
I test in on LibreOffice on Ubuntu: Version: 4.4.1.2 Build code: 40m0(Build:2) Locale: uk_UA. No changes. All equation numbers are zeros
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.5 or 5.1.2 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT - Update the version field - Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) - Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-04-16
Still reproducible in Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 86f256596c8566e80993e1cf6035bc3534b6f816 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.10; UI render: GL; VCL: gtk3; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group
still repro in 6.1.1.1 on Windows 10
Dear Viktor Mileikovskyi, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Created attachment 154155 [details] The file compared in MSO LO No captions (and no zeros that used to be) from DOC in LO 6.4+. Note: LO opens numbers right from DOCX if resaved in MSO.
Created attachment 154156 [details] The file resaved as DOCX in MSO Just for reference. The file resaved as DOCX in MSO
before https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=d32bed7af67b08037e063c4b85aaa46c55ff7781 the caption numbers were displayed as (0), after the commit, they are displayed as () @Stephan, I thought you might be interested in this issue...
(In reply to Viktor Mileikovskyi from comment #0) > Created attachment 53829 [details] > This file created by MS Office 2003 with numbered formulas > > Problem description: > I try to open .doc document created by MS Word 2003 (such as attached). > This document contains formulas in tables with captions created by next > steps: > By Insert->Reference->Caption we created new label named "(" with numeric > value and ")" after it. The attached Example.doc contains "SEQ ( \* ARABIC", which appears to violate the MS-DOC spec. <http://interoperability.blob.core.windows.net/files/MS-DOC/[MS-DOC].pdf> 2.9.90 "flt" references [ECMA-376], and <http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Office%20Open%20XML%201st%20edition%20Part%204%20(PDF).zip> contains "Office Open XML Part 4 - Markup Language Reference.pdf", which, in 2.16.5.63 "SEQ", specifies the syntax SEQ identifier [ field-argument ] [ switches ] and the requirement that "identifier shall start with a Latin letter and shall consist of no more than 40 Latin letters, Arabic digits, and underscores." An identifier of "(" does not meet that requirement. It appears to be a bug in MS Office 2003 that it allows the user to chose "(" as a name there. It is not clear to me whether and how best to cater for such documents in LO.
Dear Viktor Mileikovskyi, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
I don't see any reason to keep this bug report around. Stephan indicated that it seems to be an illegal field sequence. We only support a small subset of legitimate fields at this point, so supporting illegitimate fields is out of the question.