I've evaluates the search results for the new indexing dlls version 4.2.0.0 and found that some documents are not indexed at all. All these not-indexed .odt files do have one in common: they belong to a serie of 11 older .odt-documents linked in one .odm (OpenDocument Master Document). But one of them seems to be fully indexed nevertheless, the other 10 not at all. I've found 1 difference between the indexed document and the not indexed documents: all of them are heavily referenced to each other. But the one document which is indexed only contains internal references, whereas the other - not indexed - documents all do contain internal and EXTERNAL references (links to other documents of this serie). So, when I do open one of them directly, these external references seem to be broken. But when I work with these documents inside the master document all these links are correct. I think that the indexing is stumbled across these external references. Is it possible? Should it be corrected?
Here a correction to my previous post: with new generated cross referenced documents I can't reproduce this error of indexing. So the reason why the other documents stay not-indexed may be another one as I suspected. I only can confirm that also new saving the initially mentioned documents or change them to .doc or .docx and back to .odt doesn't allow the indexing. Interesting: these new produced .doc/.docx documents are indexed! System here: Windows 7 Professional, 64 bit, i7 2.67 GHz, 8 GB memory
Please, could you attach a document showing the problem ? And describe step by step what should be done with this document to highlight the problem. Best regards. JBF
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team
Dear Bug Submitter, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INVALID due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of FDO