Download it now!
Bug 82030 - FILEOPEN: DOCX Strict - Missing rectangles
Summary: FILEOPEN: DOCX Strict - Missing rectangles
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
(earliest affected) release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
Keywords: filter:docx
Depends on:
Blocks: OOXML-Import-Strict OOXML-Shapes
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2014-08-01 23:19 UTC by Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Modified: 2020-10-15 13:31 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

DOCX Strict file (1.07 MB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
2014-08-01 23:19 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Word 2013 VS LibO 4.3.1 (290.34 KB, image/png)
2014-08-01 23:32 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
trimmed sample (227.10 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
2017-10-23 05:49 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2014-08-01 23:19:05 UTC
Created attachment 103836 [details]
DOCX Strict file

1) Open attached DOCX
2) Notice that there isnt a blue rectangle under the image
3) Select the image and delete it
4) Notice that there isnt an orange rectangle
5) Compare this with doing the same in microsoft office

Tested in 4.2.5 and 4.3.1 on Linux Mint
Comment 1 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2014-08-01 23:32:48 UTC
Created attachment 103837 [details]
Word 2013 VS LibO 4.3.1
Comment 2 Kevin Suo 2014-08-02 06:32:12 UTC
Confirmed with, ubuntu 14.04 x64.
Set to NEW.
Comment 3 QA Administrators 2015-10-14 19:58:01 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2015-12-09 18:44:59 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 5 QA Administrators 2017-01-03 19:42:54 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 6 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2017-10-23 05:49:26 UTC
Created attachment 137223 [details]
trimmed sample
Comment 7 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2017-10-23 07:02:03 UTC
This seems similar to bug 82064 when looking at strict xml vs the transitional xml. Some of the differences between strict and transitional include

1. transitional wraps <w:drawing> inside <mc:AlternateContent><mc:Choice Requires="wps">, while strict doesn't

2. transitional uses tags under <a:graphicData> that begin with '<wps:', while strict uses '<wp:'

3. transitional uses values like this <a:lumMod val="100000" />, while strict uses <a:lumMod val="100%" />
Comment 8 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2017-10-23 07:03:52 UTC
Still repo.

Build ID: 118a0a3734a3f794c67a9d7d4376d8ed78a96fee
CPU threads: 2; OS: Linux 4.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2; 
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group

Justin, Mike: Any thoughts?
Comment 9 QA Administrators 2018-10-24 02:55:57 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete, spam)
Comment 10 Buovjaga 2020-09-30 18:04:09 UTC
Still confirmed

Arch Linux 64-bit
Build ID: 09c24681a3414092fde50ec0f617c9f7c79e8a61
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: kf5
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded
Built on 30 September 2020