Bug 82698 - FILESAVE: RTF List numbers are the wrong size
Summary: FILESAVE: RTF List numbers are the wrong size
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Master
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: filter:rtf
Depends on:
Blocks: RTF-Styles
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-08-16 09:48 UTC by Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Modified: 2024-01-26 03:14 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
sample file (116.20 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
2014-08-16 09:48 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Details
Page 1 - bullet indentation - DOCX vs RTF (346.98 KB, image/png)
2014-08-16 09:56 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Details
Page 2 - numbering list number font size - DOCX vs RTF (408.50 KB, image/png)
2014-08-16 09:57 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Details
Page 3 - headings with wrong styles - DOCX vs RTF (250.38 KB, image/png)
2014-08-16 09:58 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Details
Any Page - footnote - RTF in LibO vs RTF in MS Word (427.51 KB, image/png)
2014-08-16 10:36 UTC, Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired)
Details
The example file opened in Word and Writer master (270.59 KB, image/png)
2022-01-25 21:48 UTC, Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)
Details
The RTF saved from the docx in Writer (258.75 KB, image/png)
2022-01-25 22:12 UTC, Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)
Details
The original file and the roundtripped RTF in Word 2013 (267.19 KB, image/png)
2022-01-25 22:16 UTC, Gabor Kelemen (allotropia)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2014-08-16 09:48:45 UTC
Created attachment 104719 [details]
sample file

Steps:
1) Open attached file
2) Save it as an RTF, close it and reopen it
3) Compare the DOCX and RTF
4) On page 1, you'll notice that the bullet point indentation is wrong
5) On page 2, you'll notice that the number list numbers are the wrong size
6) On page 3, you'll notice that headings are in italics when they shouldnt be and that the 'Legal' heading is not in bold

Tested in 4.4 (2014-08-12) on Windows and 4.3.2 (2014-08-09) on Linux.
Comment 1 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2014-08-16 09:56:28 UTC
Created attachment 104722 [details]
Page 1 - bullet indentation - DOCX vs RTF
Comment 2 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2014-08-16 09:57:30 UTC
Created attachment 104723 [details]
Page 2 - numbering list number font size - DOCX vs RTF
Comment 3 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2014-08-16 09:58:19 UTC
Created attachment 104724 [details]
Page 3 - headings with wrong styles - DOCX vs RTF
Comment 4 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2014-08-16 10:36:20 UTC
Created attachment 104728 [details]
Any Page - footnote - RTF in LibO vs RTF in MS Word

If the RTF is opened in MS Word 2007 or 2013, the footnote numbers style in the document text is larger than in LibO, which causes extra space to appear above the line with the footnote.
Comment 5 Owen Genat (retired) 2014-08-23 13:23:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> 4) On page 1, you'll notice that the bullet point indentation is wrong

Confirmed.

> 5) On page 2, you'll notice that the number list numbers are the wrong size

Confirmed.

> 6) On page 3, you'll notice that headings are in italics when they shouldnt
> be and that the 'Legal' heading is not in bold

Confirmed.

> Tested in 4.4 (2014-08-12) on Windows and 4.3.2 (2014-08-09) on Linux.

Tested under GNU/Linux using v4.4.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: e379401618268ed7f7f5885a36b90e1f4f6cd4af TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2014-08-18_05:51:03

Status set to NEW.
Comment 6 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2015-12-10 01:08:27 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 7 QA Administrators 2017-01-03 19:40:56 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 8 Justin L 2017-07-25 21:28:45 UTC
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #0)
> 2) Save it as an RTF, close it and reopen it
> 3) Compare the DOCX and RTF
> 4) On page 1, you'll notice that the bullet point indentation is wrong
> 5) On page 2, you'll notice that the number list numbers are the wrong size
> 6) On page 3, you'll notice that headings are in italics when they shouldn't
> be and that the 'Legal' heading is not in bold
Confirmed this still exists in LO6.0 master
Comment 9 QA Administrators 2018-10-06 02:50:30 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 10 Buovjaga 2020-09-30 17:42:42 UTC
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) from comment #0)
> 5) On page 2, you'll notice that the number list numbers are the wrong size

This is the only remaining issue of the ones originally reported.

I also observe bug 78492 for the bullet characters. Maybe this also somehow affects the line spacing - I don't see any differing values in paragraph settings.
Comment 11 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 2022-01-25 21:48:43 UTC
Created attachment 177789 [details]
The example file opened in Word and Writer master

When the original docx is opened the numbering has TNR 10 pt font instead of Verdana 9 pt - this is a separate issue.
Comment 12 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 2022-01-25 22:12:40 UTC
Created attachment 177790 [details]
The RTF saved from the docx in Writer

The exported and re-opened RTF looks fine in master since:

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/7b8ae6f90c37c18ff724c0751b5f73cca6ae02ac

author	Tünde Tóth <toth.tunde@nisz.hu>	Fri Nov 19 12:23:41 2021 +0100
committer	László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org>	Mon Nov 29 10:54:39 2021 +0100
tree 64e64bd74aee738a71c8e1c5af966b5a656c9f15
parent 26bd14e43d7d5e81c97085f12abf1523d03bdf9a [diff]

tdf#97899 DOCX import: allow character formatting only of numbering
Comment 13 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) 2022-01-25 22:16:22 UTC
Created attachment 177791 [details]
The original file and the roundtripped RTF in Word 2013

However, the Writer-saved RTF looks different in Word than the original DOCX: font is Segoe UI 12 pt (so taller) instead of Verdana 9 pt.

There is a bit of work left here.
Comment 14 QA Administrators 2024-01-26 03:14:34 UTC
Dear Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired),

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug