Created attachment 105012 [details]
1) Open attached file
2) Save as RTF, close and reopen
3) On page 1, there will be a box that wasnt there before saving
I assume this is a fileopen issue as opening the RTF in Kingsoft or MS Word doesnt show this box. Its in 3.3, 4.2.6 and 4.3.2 on Linux.
(In reply to comment #0)
> 3) On page 1, there will be a box that wasnt there before saving
Under GNU/Linux the box is visible in v22.214.171.124 Build ID: 62ad5818884a2fc2e5780dd45466868d41009ec0 but not visible in v126.96.36.199.alpha0+ Build ID: e379401618268ed7f7f5885a36b90e1f4f6cd4af TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2014-08-18_05:51:03 so may have been fixed recently.
Created attachment 105159 [details]
how it looks on 4.3.2 on Windows
Just tested it on 4.3.2 on Windows and its still there. This bug didnt effect master on Linux when i tested build 2014-08-09.
Build ID: 5b980040676f2ce0f09b37e1070acb506cbe15e0
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:libreoffice-4-3, Time: 2014-08-19_14:08:58
@Joel: Setting bibisectRequest as this is fixed in master and not in 4.3.2.
You see Text boundaries, I assume. They are not the same in rtf and odt format.
This is, for me, a good way to show sections changes, even if I can find that in Navigator.
Yes it looks like its a text boundary, but it only appears on the first page of the RTF and not the second.
I didn't verify, but this section was not in the first document. There was only a jump to the next page. So the rtf filter added it. This is the issue.
In Word, this rtf file shows on the first page: "section break (next page)" where we should find "next page".
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I don't reproduce this.
Either it's a Windows only bug (I don't think so) or it's fixed with master sources.
Could someone give a try with recent master sources on Windows?
Just to reiterate the issue again, this is a 4.3.x bug that doesnt effect master, which likely means that it needs to be backported from master to 4.3.
Sorry Jay, I had overlooked this piece of information :-(
Miklos: thought you might have an idea about which commit(s) to backport on 4.3
The fix for bug 78907 fixed this one, now backported to libreoffice-4-3.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 78907 ***