Created attachment 108809 [details] Auto-filter feature The documentation (F1) for auto-filter says: "Automatically filters the selected cell range, and creates one-row list boxes with which you can choose the items that you want to display." How ever, for filtering is used a range that is extended from the given range by rows, until there is an empty cell at bottom. The version of calc is 4.3.3.2 (not included in version list). Expected behaviour: as documented. In attachment, a label and cells 1-9 are selected and auto-filter is created so that the first row is used as label. When filtered items are listed, there are listed also "Bottom1" - "Bottom3" (wrong), but not "Bottom 5" (ok).
Consistent with Excel behavior, BTW
I would expect such behaviour, when I have selected only the label row, and range is extended columnwise until empty cell.
I think this is not a bug. The range is auto resizing, for example write some text into empty cell (Bottom4, cell P20). This text is automaticaly included into range and range is resized.
Ubuntu 14.10 x64 LibreOffice 4.3.2.2 release Reproducible Steps: 1. Download document; 2. Click P7 3. Data -> Filter -> Autofilter (uncheck it) Observed: Autofilter goes away (good) 4. Highlight cells P7-P16 5. Data -> Filter -> Autofilter (check it) 6. Click on down arrow on P7 to get the list to appear Observed: You see values that were not highlighted (values in P17-P19) Expected: You only see what was highlighted when you applied the auto filter (thus to comport with documentation) Marking as: New Minor - can slow down professional quality work but won't prevent it Low - I don't see this having a huge impact or anything so not worth raising from default. Going to check to see if it's a regression right now, if it is I'll bibisect it. Thanks!
Apparently it's always worked this way - updating version as version is the oldest version that we can confirm the issue on. At least PreBibisect.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.4 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-12-20
[This is an automatic message] Changing version to 3.5.7.2 in order to get rid of 'preBibisect' version as 3.5.7.2 looks to be the last version not covered by bibisect-43all.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.4.1 or 5.3.6 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170929
Olivier, may be need just to change Help about Autofilter?
Reproduced in: Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: de7356c2e0cb099fac396808b5a86a0393b48e5f CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2021-06-14_22:38:17 Calc: threaded In my opinion, this is more than "low - minor". Imagine this: - select range, setup autofilter - use a filter to hide rows, expecting it to only affect selected range (understandably!) - rows below the range might end up being hidden, giving the impression to the user that data is missing / has been deleted
This is actually the same issue as Bug 35923 : autofilter / standard filter both extend the range to contiguous cells below the selected range. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 35923 ***