+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #86097 +++ Well, it is a simple Excel-sheet with some formulas but without any [specials]. If I open the file with LibreOffice Calc, most things looks like in Excel - but there are two exeptions: - Date-Values where not imported or interpretation failed.
Still in 4.4.
Hi Urmas, Do you know if this worked correct before?? thanks, Cor
I have no idea.
well - it doesn´t work the past three years. If it ever works correkt with OpenOffice.org, I do not know, but I can check with OOo 3.2.1 if nessessary.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.4 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT: - Update the version field - Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) - Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-01-17
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.5 or 5.3.0 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170306
Here under Linux/64 LibreOffice 5.1.6.2 I found, that the date part is imported, but the time part is lost (and therefore always be 00:00:00). Totally unuseable this filter - there are even problems when importing boolean values
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
different behaviour now in LO 6.1.2.1, Win 10 (64) File opens proper, date-values will be recognized correct but shown as number format. so, format musst changed manual to date-format - the figures are correct.
Which file? Report is not clear. From previous comment I conclude this could be now a duplicate of Bug 103024 see Comment 6.
@ Timor: Sorry, my note was going back to the original bug #86097 so, I got this announcement from QA Adminstrator and checked it with an orginal file - so this was the result. In Bug #86097 there was mentioned 2 bugs : 1. Date-Values, 2. Formular-values. Formular-values was fixed before, date-values still was open. This is now nearly fixed - only format is wrong.
Can you please write which file opens wrong, like "attachment 123"? And confirm whether the remaining issue is the same as in Bug 103024: Date format not recognized in a column and opened as general number?
Hi Timur, well, all Infomations can be found in Bug #86097. This is not the same bug as descriped in Bug #103024 !! I cannot give any information to this bug. But back to bug #86097 : See pic "file open in calc" (attachment 2) - Date-values where always imported as "0" - but with right cell-format. Now: Date value is correct, (i.e. 43213) but cell format is wrong (numeric) - changing to "date", everythig is ok. File is attachment 4 in Bug #86097 (original Excel file). Hope, this helps you. btw: I have tested it with a actual file provided by Amazon - maybe the have changed there output? But: in Version LO 5.3.x it is still not working (as descriped in bug #86097) , in Lo 6.1.3 values will be shown. best regrads Tom
attachment 109201 [details] is there as xls although it's xml. This IS the issue from Bug #103024. Let's close this bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103024 ***