LibreOffice4.4.0.0bata1 win64 Witer -tool -option -libreofficedevice -personalaize -ownthema Don't select 'firefox theme'.
Could you please give a little bit more information what you mean with "Don't select 'firefox theme'." Do you want to add a feature or change / correct something? Thank you very much in advance.
In this set I can't pick only nine in each category. I want to use Firefox more wallpapers.
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! This NEEDINFO Message was generated on: 2015-06-08 Warm Regards, QA Team
I know that there are many more themes. I want to put a button to be able to search for the next page.
Created attachment 116436 [details] more pages
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.5 or 5.2.1 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20160920
This bug was incorrectly moved from NEEDINFO to NEW by the reporter. Could you please try to reproduce it with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ? I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the latest version.
Created attachment 137393 [details] firefox thema I want to see more themes. Not only 9 themes, but more. For example, please set the NEXT button and show the next page.
I tested it. バージョン: 5.4.3.1 Build ID: 32c8895c6cae21571f364dbb059f419a743ee44d CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.2; UI render: default; ロケール: ja-JP (ja_JP); Calc: single
Personalization doesn't work at all. Given than we have more than 9 objects per category this request here is valid. Paging or scrolling would be required to reach the other objects. Reading this ticket the other way, users expect more than 9 objects in the personalization.
If it's technically possible 'under the hood', I suggest to add arrows and page numbers in a new area between the last theme row and the button area with Help, OK, etc. at the bottom of the dialog. Then the user can view much more themes. Proposal: << < page x of y > >> With tooltips we can show what the arrows do (to the first result page, one result page back, one result page forward, to the last result page). @Muhammet Kara Do we know how many themes a category has?
(In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #11) > If it's technically possible 'under the hood', I suggest to add arrows and > page numbers in a new area between the last theme row and the button area > with Help, OK, etc. at the bottom of the dialog. Then the user can view much > more themes. > > Proposal: > > << < page x of y > >> > > With tooltips we can show what the arrows do (to the first result page, one > result page back, one result page forward, to the last result page). > > @Muhammet Kara > Do we know how many themes a category has? With the new code under the hood, we now know the exact number of themes in a category or search result set. And we can even get the results page by page.
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10) > Personalization doesn't work at all. Given than we have more than 9 objects > per category this request here is valid. Paging or scrolling would be > required to reach the other objects. > > Reading this ticket the other way, users expect more than 9 objects in the > personalization. Yes,I was able to get the theme from the Firefox site freely in the previous version. Jun'ichi Matsukawa.
Firefox/Mozilla personas feature was removed as per ESC and Design Team decisions. Related patch: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/72811/ Related bug report: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125217
I see. Thanks.