When indenting the first line of a paragraph through the paragraph settings dialog in the format menu, orca says the text is indented when I use the "orca+f" keyboard command even if I am not on the first line of the paragraph. Orca should only announce this indent when on the first line of the paragraph.
Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (a11y -> accessibility)
Created attachment 124882 [details] random test document Reproduced. Attaching a sample document. In Pararaph settings I set first line indentation to 0.28". I also set before text indentation to 0.1". This is what the screen reader says for characters in any line, pressing Orca-F: "Size 12, Family Name Liberation Serif, Indent 7.11 mm, Paragraph Style Default Style" etc... I'm not entirely sure how it's supposed to work, is it fine that before text indentation is disregarded? It certainly announces the first line indent for each line (the indent is announced in lines after a line break, too). Another interesting thing to note is that while in this particular installation I used imperial units to specify the indentation, the reader announces it in metric. Is that a bug, or separate settings? OS: Ubuntu 15.10 LO Version: 5.0.5.2 Build ID: 1:5.0.5~rc2-0ubuntu2 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8)
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.7 or 5.3.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170522
Dear all, The issue is still present on LibreOfficeDev 5.5 from 2017-05-28. Best regards.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear am_dxer, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
I can confirm that Orca only reads out the first line indentation on 7.11mm, but it does *not* give the before text indentation. Reproduced in LibreOffice 7.3.2
Dear am_dxer, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Still the same in LODev26.8.0.0alpha0 and Orca from Git, but... (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #2) > I'm not entirely sure how it's supposed to work, is it fine that before text > indentation is disregarded? It certainly announces the first line indent for > each line (the indent is announced in lines after a line break, too). I don't know what users really expect here, we'd need input on this I guess. I see however (in Accerciser) that LO *does* report all three of "before text indent", "after text indent" and "first line indent", respectively as "left-margin", "right-margin" and "indent". So I see a few options: 1. don't change anything, and let the screen reader read whatever values it likes. 2. report the effective indent for the paragraph, that would be... "before text indent" + "first line indent" maybe? 3. report the effective indent for the visual line at the current position (like above, but take the visual line into account, so on the first line it could be as 2, but on subsequent lines it would be "before text indent" alone). 4. like the above, but report this in addition to the actual values (possibly put the computed result in "indent", and the rest as different attributes. IMO, it mostly depend on the use case, but the current situation isn't too bad but for knowing the *effective* indentation of the line. There also is a technical limitation for all variants where the visual line is taken into consideration, because the accessibility API is twofold: default attributes, and range attributes. Default attributes are usually not announced without asking for them explicitly -- e.g. if you move over the text, you won't be presented with the default attributes, but only with the range ones, which might include e.g. misspelling. And default attributes are a property of the whole text portion (e.g. paragraph), not a range. This means that there is no real way to convey a default attribute that changes in the middle of the paragraph, so we would have to make it a range attribute. And so, we could either always get notified of the indent changing whenever moving through the text, or we'd have to have the screen reader play along by e.g. filtering out the "indent" attribute then. Maybe the Orca dev has an opinion here. But at any rate, the reason why the user want to hear out the indentation will play a large role here, because e.g. in a code editor what usually matters is the *physical* line indentation, not the visual one. Here we're having a layout software as well, so maybe the needs are different though; but is the effective indentation the useful thing, or do we actually need the value of all the three settings? In this case, it should either be presented by the screen reader, or we'd leave the user to inspect paragraph properties if they need finer info. At any rate the three values *are* available, the question is whether they are presented correctly, and whether they are presented in a useful way to the user. > Another interesting thing to note is that while in this particular > installation I used imperial units to specify the indentation, the reader > announces it in metric. Is that a bug, or separate settings? I'd flag this as a bug (in how the value is rendered for presenting), as it should ideally be in a unit the user is comfortable with. And although the metric system is the real answer (:grin:) conversion is not so trivial that everybody can use that interchangeably. Hopefully it's an easy fix using the localized value taking the preference into account. If we're out of luck, it's hard to retrieve the relevant flag in the stage the value is generated, but I kinda doubt it.