Created attachment 114384 [details] XLSM The attached XLSM file is not shown the same when opening as in other commercial office programs
Hello, your printscreen is very complex. Please attach printsreen from other commercial office programs and describe where is bug. Also please test with actual version of LO, http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ Then set to unconfirmed.
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team This NEEDINFO message was generated on: 2015-10-14
Created attachment 124490 [details] Home page
Created attachment 124491 [details] Office laptops
Created attachment 124492 [details] Price list
I created 3 screenshots with office 2003 side-by-side (yep, that old, runs on wine). It looks like reporter tried to design a website with Calc (why is beyond me). It is a great showcase of overly designed document to test import/export filters against. It's main problem is Excel 2003 does not import merged cells (not in xlsx nor xls format saved from LibO 5.1.2.1, strange).
error log from office2010 when open file: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?> - <recoveryLog xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main"> <logFileName>error025200_01.xml</logFileName> <summary>Errors were detected in file 'test.xlsx'</summary> - <removedRecords summary="Following is a list of removed records:"> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Named range from /xl/workbook.xml part (Workbook)</removedRecord> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Formula from /xl/worksheets/sheet4.xml part</removedRecord> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Formula from /xl/worksheets/sheet5.xml part</removedRecord> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Formula from /xl/worksheets/sheet6.xml part</removedRecord> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Formula from /xl/worksheets/sheet7.xml part</removedRecord> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Formula from /xl/worksheets/sheet8.xml part</removedRecord> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Formula from /xl/worksheets/sheet9.xml part</removedRecord> <removedRecord>Removed Records: Formula from /xl/worksheets/sheet10.xml part</removedRecord> </removedRecords> </recoveryLog> compared few sheets in office2010 and LO Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+ - doesn't see difference. mahfiaz, office 2003 or 2013?
raal, not a typo, Office 2003 Thanks for testing. Since you say it looks fine in Office 2013, it's best to close this bug.