Bug 92741 - Images only rotate 90º
Summary: Images only rotate 90º
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 73797
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.4.4.3 release
Hardware: Other All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-07-14 21:36 UTC by Brock McNuggets
Modified: 2015-07-15 01:36 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Brock McNuggets 2015-07-14 21:36:30 UTC 
Cannot rotate images by any amount other than 90º

Shown here: https://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c?t=3m30s
Comment 1 Julien Nabet 2015-07-14 22:08:07 UTC 
On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce this too.

Brock: very interesting video comparing Word and LO Writer (not only about the rotation part)
remark: I'd suggest you using "Lorem ipsum" text instead of repeating "this is a test", it could be more realistic (see http://www.lipsum.com/ for generating n paragraphs)

ux team: any thoughts?
Comment 2 V Stuart Foote 2015-07-14 22:30:56 UTC 
Dupe of bug 73797, and see bug 34423 for history of adding image rotation to LO.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 73797 ***
Comment 3 Brock McNuggets 2015-07-15 01:36:20 UTC 
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #1)
> On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I could reproduce
> this too.
> 
> Brock: very interesting video comparing Word and LO Writer (not only about
> the rotation part)
> remark: I'd suggest you using "Lorem ipsum" text instead of repeating "this
> is a test", it could be more realistic (see http://www.lipsum.com/ for
> generating n paragraphs)
> 
> ux team: any thoughts?

Good thought. I use that or "corporate mumbo jumbo" in other videos. :)

In my video I actually point out a lot of bugs, but do not have the time to research and post them all - and in this case see it is a duplicate.

Sorry about that.