Created attachment 119715 [details] italic character slightly cut When I write a word in italic and the immediate character is not italic, the character in italic gets slightly cut where the intermitent cursor/selection area limit was standing. The "not italic" order sent to the place where the cursor/selection area limit is erases the part where the italic character is placed. See the attached file, please.
I can not confirm with LO 5.0.2, win7. Please attach test file and test with version 5.0.2. http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/
Created attachment 119717 [details] look closely, the "y" is slightly cut
I can confirm with Version: 5.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 8273350ff48f198efc9dc9c5de5519b8cbdc0cb3 TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@70-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2015-10-07_05:54:26 and LibreOffice 3.5.0
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.6 or 5.2.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20161108
I tested the bug and it still remains. I write some text in normal mode, followed by a comma. I select the text but not the comma and turn it to italic. The vertical limit of the selection area "cuts" the last letter of the text. It's like the italic wants to get out of the selection area and the part that would get out of it is cut of and not displayed.
Oh, and my OS is Windows 10, and my LO version is 5.1.6.2!
Indeed, the bug is still there. Looks much better with a 5.3 daily build, though (using the unified layout), the "y" is only cut in the first line, but not anymore in line 2 and 3.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
The same problem appears using italic character with subscript. Very strong cut (up to half-letter) can be obtained using drawing fonts (like ISOCPEUR). I can confirm it in LO 6.2.4.2 during diaplaying, PDF export and printing, when the text is highlighted, especially, in the color of the page background. When I select the affected text and choose "No Fill" in the highlight button, the font appears normally. The problem is, possibly, caused by a mistake displaying characters. Non-highlighted characters are displayed by setting foreground pixels only. Background pixels are not changed. If the next character coincides with the previous one, the collision will be resolved correctly like ligature. Highlighted characters are displayed by setting both foreground and background pixels. The next character will overwrite the previous one, causing a crop. One of the possible solutions is using special overlapping algorithms: 1. Setting background pixels only if they are not in the boundary of the previous character (priority by the previous character). It can cause partial highlighting of the first highlighted character. 2. Setting background pixels only if they are not set by the previous character (priority by the next character). It can cause partial highlighting of the previous non-highlighted character. This solution is seen at other text editors. 3. Setting background pixels only if they are not set by the previous character, starting from the average line between characters (balanced). It can cause some throttling of the program but the result appears better. To avoid problems with old maschines, it is possible to add an option to LibreOffice settings.
Created attachment 151899 [details] Test with highlighting shows wrong overlapping. Without highlighting the text appears correctly
Dear jlbraga, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
(In reply to Viktor Mileikovskyi from comment #11) > Created attachment 151899 [details] > Test with highlighting shows wrong overlapping. Without highlighting the > text appears correctly I observe the same thing, original attachment 119717 [details] had a white highlight on the last character, which is what would hide part of the previous character. Changing the summary accordingly. Same in OOo 3.3, and reproduced in recent trunk build: Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: ff9c8b62c1015972e9e89799832fa3690dcd46b4 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded But this is already tracked in bug 43643. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 43643 ***