Relates to bug 95124: As the direction of the "Székely-magyar rovás (Szekler-Hungarian Rovas)" script is right-to-left, top-to-bottom: Please add support for : Tools -> Options -> Language Settings -> Languages -> Complex text layout (CLT): Székely-magyar rovás ISO 15924: Hung, 176 Direction: Right-to-left Thank you
Let's set to NEW. I think this should be enhancement.
erack: Thank you for fixing bug 97406 enhancement. Is it also possible to add it to the Complex text layout (CLT) as it is a right-to-left language?
Oh, sure, that should just had been mentioned in bug 97406 instead of a separate one.. I didn't know.
Eike Rathke committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1d3bb054b2f69f3af5ba49f0cf5ff8c7ac72f625 Resolves: tdf#95162 Hung is RTL/CTL It will be available in 5.3.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #3) > Oh, sure, that should just had been mentioned in bug 97406 instead of a > separate one.. I didn't know. Sorry, I did not know it could go in one enhancement bug report. Thank you
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #4) > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/ > ?id=1d3bb054b2f69f3af5ba49f0cf5ff8c7ac72f625 > Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. Does LANGUAGE_USER_HUNGARIAN_RUNIC: need to be changed to: ROVAS ?
(In reply to Óvári from comment #6) > (In reply to Commit Notification from comment #4) > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/ > > ?id=1d3bb054b2f69f3af5ba49f0cf5ff8c7ac72f625 > > Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. > > Does > LANGUAGE_USER_HUNGARIAN_RUNIC: > need to be changed to: > ROVAS > ? The ROVAS is much better, because there is no any historical relation to RUNES, therefore it would be misleading to say Hungarian runes. However you may say the rovas is "runic like". This script has its own name, like all living scripts. Please do not change back. See Bug 97406.
(In reply to Óvári from comment #6) > Does > LANGUAGE_USER_HUNGARIAN_RUNIC: > need to be changed to: > ROVAS It really doesn't matter because it is just an internal name of a define, but I did that anyway.
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #8) > It really doesn't matter because it is just an internal name of a define, > but I did that anyway. Thank you very much.