Created attachment 119834 [details] Original File When it show a Formula is displayed with a red "?" sign, but wrongly, I added 2 PDF, 1 created by LO and other by MS Office. I added the DOCX file too. Versión: 5.0.2.2 Id. de compilación: 37b43f919e4de5eeaca9b9755ed688758a8251fe Configuración regional: es-CL (es_CL.UTF-8)
Created attachment 119835 [details] File generated by LO, exactly as visible by LO
Created attachment 119836 [details] File Exported by MS Office from Original File
Tried with version 4.0.6.2, so update “earliest affected” It looks like formula is distorted due to >>+<< right after differentials int from {3} to {4} {g left (3,y,-1 right ) dy+} int from {3} to {4} {g left (x,x,-2 right ) dx+} int from {3} to {4} {g left (3,4,z right ) dz} the expected one would be int from {3} to {4} {g left (3,y,-1 right ) dy} + int from {3} to {4} {g left (x,x,-2 right ) dx} + int from {3} to {4} {g left (3,4,z right ) dz}
well, that's correct, moving that "+" to outside fix this. I received this from my teacher, I was not relationed with this so my first idea was to report it to "fix it". Thanks Douglas. In MS Office this works just fine, should it do in LO too?
(In reply to Maximiliano Castañón from comment #4) > In MS Office this works just fine, should it do in LO too? Well, >>//a sophisticated system to determine what expressions are opened is required, but this is as much work as rewriting starmaths internals<< ( comment from starmath/source/mathtype.cxx )
*** Bug 98948 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.7 or 5.3.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170522
With 6.2+ as in Comment 3.
Dear Maximiliano Castañón, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Created attachment 178930 [details] Original DOCX compared in MSO and LO After formula was seen from when it was 1st reported, it still has marks in 7.4+.
Repro 25.2+
This has the "plus" sighs in the DOCX not as proper m:oMath structure, but as text. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 162070 ***