Bug 95719 - Sidebar: "Cell Apprearance - Select line style of the borders" actually activates Cell Borders command
Summary: Sidebar: "Cell Apprearance - Select line style of the borders" actually activ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.1.0.0.alpha1
Hardware: Other Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: target:5.1.0
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-11-10 08:13 UTC by Kevin Suo
Modified: 2016-10-25 19:20 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
screenshot (382.77 KB, image/png)
2015-11-10 08:27 UTC, Kevin Suo
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kevin Suo 2015-11-10 08:13:03 UTC
--- Steps to Reproduce: ---

1. New Calc, select a cell;
2. In sidebar, go to "Cell Apprearance -> Specify the borders of the selected cells", choose "All Borders";
3. In the same sidebar area, select "Select line style of the borders"
--> This command actually activates the "Specify the borders of the selected cells" command, not the line style command.

"Select line style of the borders" should be the command which allow users to select the line style (solid, dash, thick etc).

Broken in
Version: 5.1.0.0.alpha1
Build ID: a8e4f75fe264f6ece37c154951cff53f2f4fa3e4
Locale: zh-CN (zh_CN)
Win10 X86.

This is a regression in. It works OK in Version: 5.0.3.2.
Comment 1 Kevin Suo 2015-11-10 08:27:34 UTC
Created attachment 120439 [details]
screenshot
Comment 3 steve 2015-11-10 10:57:53 UTC
I'm not sure I understand the timings here. If it was fixed end of october, does that mean kevin is running a very old 5.1alpha? Would be nice to have a date in that version info so it's easier to understand such timings. cause if the alpha is newer than the fix, it is indeed a regression, no?
Comment 4 Maxim Monastirsky 2015-11-10 11:03:38 UTC
(In reply to steve -_- from comment #3)
> I'm not sure I understand the timings here. If it was fixed end of october,
> does that mean kevin is running a very old 5.1alpha? Would be nice to have a
> date in that version info so it's easier to understand such timings.
You can easily find the date by the Build ID. In this case it is [1], which means Kevin is running the released alpha1 build found at [2], not current master.

[1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=a8e4f75fe264f6ece37c154951cff53f2f4fa3e4
[2] http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86/