Created attachment 120526 [details] bugdoc (RTF) The attached RTF document contains a simple table in a footnote. When the file is opened with LibreOffice, the table in footnote is not visible. However, when user hovers the mouse over the footnote area, the table cells appear one by one, and finally the table becomes visible. Table cell dimensions are not the same as in MS Word.
Similar to 95806: same problem in 3.6.6 4.4.3 shows a different problem (more lines in the footnote and the text "This footnote contains a table" is in Cell 1) and 3.4.4 no table at all.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.6 or 5.2.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170103
Repro 6.3+.
reproduced with Version: 6.4.4.2 (x64) Build ID: 3d775be2011f3886db32dfd395a6a6d1ca2630ff CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: GL; VCL: win; Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Language: en-US Calc: CL
Repro 7.2+. Another example is RTF attachment 152130 [details]. DOCX was fixed by converting them to floating tables during import/export in https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/e11c51eefe8c3210cef2b5850f401ba67a401d01 Bug is fileopen but filesave might be also fixed here, so let's keep together.
Hi Laszlo. I noticed your fix of DOCX tables in footnote (both open and save). Normally, I'd consider RTF different (I noticed you do just OOXML) but it seems that you fixed open part but not save. If you can explain, thanks.
Fixed by https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/e11c51eefe8c3210cef2b5850f401ba67a401d01 tdf#95806 tdf#125877 tdf#141172 DOCX: fix tables in footnotes Note: previously exporting to RTF and reload the document resulted an empty document. Now export & reload results the document, also the table, but with the frame used for as a workaround for the incomplete/bad handling of not-floating tables (table in a text frame) in footnotes and endnotes.
(In reply to Timur from comment #6) > Hi Laszlo. I noticed your fix of DOCX tables in footnote (both open and > save). > Normally, I'd consider RTF different (I noticed you do just OOXML) but it > seems that you fixed open part but not save. > If you can explain, thanks. Hi Timur, previously save & reload resulted an empty document (I checked with the master and LO 6.2), but now it works well (not perfectly, see my previous comment about the exported frame). If you think, you can file a new issue for the remaining/new export problem. Thanks for your feedback!
Thanks, I opened bug in See Also.