cell spacing is set to 0,71mm automatically at some actions - that might be just moving cells by drag&drop. It doesn't happen in a new file I just created for tests - of course... I can provide a file, if necessary Most interestingly, the left/ source cells after moving cells get this format, not the target cells! It is a rather new phenomenon to me, maybe just some months. Possible influences: usually I use .xls format to be able to open it on a PC with MS Office with minimum problems, and I edit the files there usually as well. I see similar bug reports (but not really solutions there), so maybe this is another piece to the whole picture to finally solve it...
(In reply to foxtrot from comment #0) > cell spacing is set to 0,71mm automatically at some actions - that might be > just moving cells by drag&drop. > It doesn't happen in a new file I just created for tests - of course... I > can provide a file, if necessary > > Most interestingly, the left/ source cells after moving cells get this > format, not the target cells! > > It is a rather new phenomenon to me, maybe just some months. > > Possible influences: usually I use .xls format to be able to open it on a PC > with MS Office with minimum problems, and I edit the files there usually as > well. > > I see similar bug reports (but not really solutions there), so maybe this is > another piece to the whole picture to finally solve it... Can you provide a screenshot and the file?
Hello, Thank you for filing the bug. Please send us a sample document, as this makes it easier for us to verify the bug. I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO', so please do change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once you have attached a document. (Please note that the attachment will be public, remove any sensitive information before attaching it.) How can I eliminate confidential data from a sample document? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FAQ#How_can_I_eliminate_confidential_data_from_a_sample_document.3F Thank you
Created attachment 124474 [details] file with that problem
see attached a file with that problem. (there is nothing confidential in it - just some tips for nice restaurants around here ;) It appears that all xls-files I just tried have that problem (and all of them I might have edited in MS Office), but not an ODS file I just tried.
Created attachment 124585 [details] another one... in this file, I just transferred the format from one cell to another, and the target line got more height
(In reply to foxtrot from comment #3) > Created attachment 124474 [details] > file with that problem So what should we do with this? The cell spacing is already 0,71mm in all the cells. I do notice when selecting cells and dragging and dropping them somewhere, the source cells somehow refresh, like they were not displaying the 0,71mm spacing before. 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5 Build ID: 5.1.2.2 Arch Linux build-1 CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Linux 4.5; UI Render: default; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8)
Hello Buovjaga! Thank you for that hint. As you ask, what you should do: set the spacing to 0,5, save and reopen - it will be 0,71 again. That's the problem.
Ah, I thought we had to drag and drop something. Now I reproduce with the file. Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: e76d458422b0f0f713cc17bf47ca94c33ac570a7 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.1; UI Render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2016-05-03_06:32:27 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI) LibreOffice 3.5.0rc3 Build ID: 7e68ba2-a744ebf-1f241b7-c506db1-7d53735
now, knowing this effect better (it doesn't need drag&drop, that just triggers the refresh), I just created a new file, saved it as xls, reopened it, and voila - 0,71mm. Not the same with ods. It's not necessary to edit it on a PC in MS-office, it's right in Libreoffice. I seem to forgot to mention that i work on Mac - don't know if this is relevant here...
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.7 or 5.3.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170522
Hi there! The problem changed a little: Now (version 5.0.x and 5.3.3) the cell spacing is now 0,45cm (standard) when I open the file. When I edit something (e.g. move contents) the source line is changed to 0,52cm. That is still only in xls-files, not in ods and not in xlsx. (but xls is still the format with the least compatibility problems...) Mac OS X 10.9.5 Best regards, foxtrot
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
In bug 118245 the reporter came back to inform that Excel's formats are limited regarding this and there is nothing we can do. Thus closing.