Bug 38809 - Analyse/Improve Structure and Cache efficiency with DHAT/valgrind
Summary: Analyse/Improve Structure and Cache efficiency with DHAT/valgrind
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
unspecified
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: reviewed:2023
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Dev-related
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-06-30 06:54 UTC by Björn Michaelsen
Modified: 2025-12-27 03:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Björn Michaelsen 2011-06-30 06:54:15 UTC
Improve Structure / Cache efficiency

Background: there is a new (experimental) valgrind tool called 'DHAT, a dynamic heap analysis tool'. It generates output a little like this. The data is rather hard to interpret, and has some false positives (eg. the opendir hits), but can point to large chunks of memory that are allocated written to, but then never read from, or identify holes in frequently used structures, and so on. It would be great to do further analysis on the data, discuss it on the list, and then patch the various classes / structures / calls in most need.

Skills: building, C++ hacking, C++ ABI understanding, patience.
Comment 1 Florian Reisinger 2012-05-18 08:56:30 UTC
Deteted "Easyhack" from summary
Comment 2 Björn Michaelsen 2013-10-04 18:47:49 UTC
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved EasyHacks for better visibility.

see e.g. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-ESC-call-td4076214.html for details
Comment 3 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2015-12-14 05:03:39 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2016-02-18 14:52:32 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 5 Hossein 2023-12-27 13:53:29 UTC
Re-evaluating the EasyHack in 2023

It will be useful to do some analysis with DHAT/valgrind and then improve the code, but as the area and the scope of the task is not very clear, I remove the EasyHack tag.
Comment 6 QA Administrators 2025-12-27 03:24:00 UTC
Dear Björn Michaelsen,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug