Bug 62654 - FORMATTING: ENHANCEMENT: List numbering with maximum number of optional zero-filled leading digits
Summary: FORMATTING: ENHANCEMENT: List numbering with maximum number of optional zero-...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.0.1.2 release
Hardware: Other All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: BSA
Keywords:
: 107125 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: Bullet-Number-Outline-Lists
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-03-22 22:51 UTC by dblagent007
Modified: 2017-04-23 17:55 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description dblagent007 2013-03-22 22:51:13 UTC
Problem description: 
I would like to create a style that is numbered like this:
0001
0002
0003
0004
0005
0006
0007
0008
0009
0010
…
0099
0100
0101
...
[9999]

I can't do this using the existing option to add three zeros before the number because when the number goes from 9 to 10 (or 99 to 100) it does this
0009
00010

I can use fields to get a numbered list like I want. See the explanation provided at the forum here (I also attached a document that shows the list I created using fields): http://en.libreofficeforum.org/node/5557

The problem with using fields is that I can't automatically include the field at the beginning of a style.

Here is another thread on the forum that discusses a similar numbering schema. http://en.libreofficeforum.org/node/2926
Operating System: Windows 7
Version: 4.0.1.2 release
Comment 1 sophie 2013-11-06 16:49:41 UTC
Confirmed that this is currently not possible. Version: 4.1.3.2
Build ID: 70feb7d99726f064edab4605a8ab840c50ec57a Ubuntu 13.10. Set to new, add Enhancement. Didn't found duplicates. Sophie
Comment 2 sophie 2013-11-06 16:50:05 UTC
Changed plateform to all too - Sophie
Comment 3 Buovjaga 2017-04-23 17:54:25 UTC
*** Bug 107125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***